arXiv:2512.17954cs.CVcs.LG2025-12

提出新对比学习方法,提升细粒度图像分类准确率。

SCS-SupCon: Sigmoid-based Common and Style Supervised Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Decision Boundaries

  • 用可学习的温度与偏置参数设计新损失函数,自适应调整分类边界。
  • 在CIFAR-100上比SupCon高3.9个百分点,细粒度数据集上最高提升3.0点。
  • 适合需要强判别力的细粒度识别任务,尤其对风格变化鲁棒性强。

图像分类受类间差异微小和类内变化大限制,现有对比学习方法效果受限。基于InfoNCE的监督对比方法存在负样本稀释问题且缺乏自适应决策边界,削弱了细粒度识别能力。为此,我们提出基于Sigmoid的共性与风格监督对比学习(SCS-SupCon)。该框架引入带可学习温度与偏置参数的Sigmoid形式成对对比损失,实现自适应决策边界,强调困难负样本,缓解负样本稀释,并更高效利用监督信号。此外,显式风格距离约束进一步解耦风格与内容表征,提升特征鲁棒性。在六个基准数据集(含CUB200-2011、Stanford Dogs)上的实验表明,SCS-SupCon在CNN与Transformer主干网络上均达到当前最优性能。在使用ResNet-50的CIFAR-100上,相比SupCon提升约3.9个百分点,相比CS-SupCon提升约1.7个百分点(五折交叉验证)。在细粒度数据集上,相较CS-SupCon提升0.4–3.0个百分点。大量消融实验与统计分析(含Friedman检验与Nemenyi事后检验)验证了方法的稳健性与泛化能力。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Image classification is hindered by subtle inter-class differences and substantial intra-class variations, which limit the effectiveness of existing contrastive learning methods. Supervised contrastive approaches based on the InfoNCE loss suffer from negative-sample dilution and lack adaptive decision boundaries, thereby reducing discriminative power in fine-grained recognition tasks. To address these limitations, we propose Sigmoid-based Common and Style Supervised Contrastive Learning (SCS-SupCon). Our framework introduces a sigmoid-based pairwise contrastive loss with learnable temperature and bias parameters to enable adaptive decision boundaries. This formulation emphasizes hard negatives, mitigates negative-sample dilution, and more effectively exploits supervision. In addition, an explicit style-distance constraint further disentangles style and content representations, leading to more robust feature learning. Comprehensive experiments on six benchmark datasets, including CUB200-2011 and Stanford Dogs, demonstrate that SCS-SupCon achieves state-of-the-art performance across both CNN and Transformer backbones. On CIFAR-100 with ResNet-50, SCS-SupCon improves top-1 accuracy over SupCon by approximately 3.9 percentage points and over CS-SupCon by approximately 1.7 points under five-fold cross-validation. On fine-grained datasets, it outperforms CS-SupCon by 0.4--3.0 points. Extensive ablation studies and statistical analyses further confirm the robustness and generalization of the proposed framework, with Friedman tests and Nemenyi post-hoc evaluations validating the stability of the observed improvements.

对比学习细粒度识别图像分类自适应边界

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。