arXiv:2512.20104cs.CV2025-12被引 1

对比激活函数与优化器组合对动作识别模型性能的影响

Effect of Activation Function and Model Optimizer on the Performance of Human Activity Recognition System Using Various Deep Learning Models

  • 测试三种激活函数与四种优化器在两种模型中的组合效果
  • ConvLSTM+Adam/RMSprop达99%准确率,优于BiLSTM
  • 结果可指导医疗场景下高精度动作识别系统设计

动作识别(HAR)在医疗、监控和智能环境中至关重要,可靠的动作识别支持及时决策与自动化。尽管基于深度学习的HAR系统广泛应用,但激活函数(AFs)与模型优化器(MOs)对性能的影响尚未充分分析,尤其是其组合如何影响实际场景中的模型行为。现有研究多关注架构设计,而对AF与MO交互关系探讨较少。本文研究三种常见激活函数(ReLU、Sigmoid、Tanh)与四种优化算法(SGD、Adam、RMSprop、Adagrad)在两种循环神经网络架构(BiLSTM、ConvLSTM)中的组合效果。实验在从HMDB51和UCF101数据集中选取的六个医学相关动作类别上进行,评估其在医疗导向的HAR应用中的适用性。结果显示,ConvLSTM在两个数据集上均优于BiLSTM;ConvLSTM搭配Adam或RMSprop时,准确率最高达99.00%,展现出强大的时空学习能力与稳定性。相比之下,BiLSTM在UCF101上表现良好(接近98.00%),但在HMDB51上下降至约60.00%,表明其跨数据集鲁棒性差且对激活函数与优化器变化不敏感。本研究为优化真实医疗环境中的HAR系统提供了实用指导。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) plays a vital role in healthcare, surveillance, and innovative environments, where reliable action recognition supports timely decision-making and automation. Although deep learning-based HAR systems are widely adopted, the impact of Activation Functions (AFs) and Model Optimizers (MOs) on performance has not been sufficiently analyzed, particularly regarding how their combinations influence model behavior in practical scenarios. Most existing studies focus on architecture design, while the interaction between AF and MO choices remains relatively unexplored. In this work, we investigate the effect of three commonly used activation functions (ReLU, Sigmoid, and Tanh) combined with four optimization algorithms (SGD, Adam, RMSprop, and Adagrad) using two recurrent deep learning architectures, namely BiLSTM and ConvLSTM. Experiments are conducted on six medically relevant activity classes selected from the HMDB51 and UCF101 datasets, considering their suitability for healthcare-oriented HAR applications. Our experimental results show that ConvLSTM consistently outperforms BiLSTM across both datasets. ConvLSTM, combined with Adam or RMSprop, achieves an accuracy of up to 99.00%, demonstrating strong spatio-temporal learning capabilities and stable performance. While BiLSTM performs reasonably well on UCF101, with accuracy approaching 98.00%, its performance drops to approximately 60.00% on HMDB51, indicating limited robustness across datasets and weaker sensitivity to AF and MO variations. This study provides practical insights for optimizing HAR systems, particularly for real-world healthcare environments where fast and precise activity detection is critical.

动作识别深度学习模型优化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。