arXiv:2512.24497cs.AIcs.LG2025-12中稿 · ance at TMLR被引 30

探究联合嵌入世界模型中规划成功的关键因素

What Drives Success in Physical Planning with Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models?

  • 在模型表征空间中进行规划,抽象无关细节提升效率
  • 新模型在导航与操作任务上优于DINO-WM和V-JEPA-2-AC基线
  • 实测验证了架构、训练目标与规划算法的协同影响

AI长期挑战在于构建能解决多种物理任务并泛化到新任务与环境的智能体。近期流行方法是从状态-动作轨迹训练世界模型,并结合规划算法求解新任务。传统规划在输入空间进行,而新兴方法在世界模型的学得表征空间中优化,有望通过抽象无关细节实现更高效规划。本文将此类模型统称为JEPA-WMs,系统研究其关键技术选择对规划成功率的影响。我们在模拟环境和真实机器人数据上展开实验,分析模型架构、训练目标与规划算法的作用。综合发现后,提出一种新模型,在导航与操作任务上均超越两个基准(DINO-WM和V-JEPA-2-AC)。代码、数据与模型检查点已公开于https://github.com/facebookresearch/jepa-wms。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

A long-standing challenge in AI is to develop agents capable of solving a wide range of physical tasks and generalizing to new, unseen tasks and environments. A popular recent approach involves training a world model from state-action trajectories and subsequently use it with a planning algorithm to solve new tasks. Planning is commonly performed in the input space, but a recent family of methods has introduced planning algorithms that optimize in the learned representation space of the world model, with the promise that abstracting irrelevant details yields more efficient planning. In this work, we characterize models from this family as JEPA-WMs and investigate the technical choices that make algorithms from this class work. We propose a comprehensive study of several key components with the objective of finding the optimal approach within the family. We conducted experiments using both simulated environments and real-world robotic data, and studied how the model architecture, the training objective, and the planning algorithm affect planning success. We combine our findings to propose a model that outperforms two established baselines, DINO-WM and V-JEPA-2-AC, in both navigation and manipulation tasks. Code, data and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/jepa-wms.

世界模型物理规划联合嵌入机器人

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。