arXiv:2601.04216cs.CYcs.AI2026-01

构建可计算的AI儿童治理评估框架,识别政策落地关键缺口

Computable Gap Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Governance in Children's Centres: Evidence-Mechanism-Governance-Indicator Modelling of UNICEF's Guidance on AI and Children 3.0 Based on the Graph-GAP Framework

  • 用四层图结构分解政策要求:证据-机制-治理-指标,实现可追溯
  • 提出GAP评分与缓解准备度两项量化指标,发现发展权等三类缺口更严重
  • 引入多模型并行编码+可信度评估流程,确保标注结果可靠可复现

本文针对儿童中心人工智能治理中的实践难题——政策文本虽有原则性要求,却缺乏可复现的证据锚点、明确因果路径、可执行治理链条和可计算审计指标——提出Graph-GAP方法。该方法将权威政策文本中的要求分解为证据、机制、治理、指标四层图结构,计算GAP分数与缓解准备度两项指标,识别治理缺口并优先排序行动。以联合国儿童基金会儿童与AI指南3.0为材料,定义可复现的提取单元、编码手册、图模式、评分尺度及一致性检查规则,展示十个要求的典型缺口画像与治理优先级矩阵。结果显示,相较于隐私与数据保护,涉及儿童福祉与发展、可解释性与问责、跨机构协作与资源分配的要求更易出现指标与机制缺口。建议将要求转化为可审计的闭环治理,整合儿童权利影响评估、持续监测指标与申诉处理机制。在编码层面,引入多算法评审聚合修订工作流,平行运行规则编码器、统计/机器学习评估器及大模型评估器,每条提取单元输出带有证据锚点的标签与准备度分数。通过Krippendorff alpha、加权卡帕系数、组内相关系数及自助法置信区间评估可靠性、稳定性和不确定性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This paper tackles practical challenges in governing child centered artificial intelligence: policy texts state principles and requirements but often lack reproducible evidence anchors, explicit causal pathways, executable governance toolchains, and computable audit metrics. We propose Graph-GAP, a methodology that decomposes requirements from authoritative policy texts into a four layer graph of evidence, mechanism, governance, and indicator, and that computes two metrics, GAP score and mitigation readiness, to identify governance gaps and prioritise actions. Using the UNICEF Innocenti Guidance on AI and Children 3.0 as primary material, we define reproducible extraction units, coding manuals, graph patterns, scoring scales, and consistency checks, and we demonstrate exemplar gap profiles and governance priority matrices for ten requirements. Results suggest that compared with privacy and data protection, requirements related to child well being and development, explainability and accountability, and cross agency implementation and resource allocation are more prone to indicator gaps and mechanism gaps. We recommend translating requirements into auditable closed loop governance that integrates child rights impact assessments, continuous monitoring metrics, and grievance redress procedures. At the coding level, we introduce a multi algorithm review aggregation revision workflow that runs rule based encoders, statistical or machine learning evaluators, and large model evaluators with diverse prompt configurations as parallel coders. Each extraction unit outputs evidence, mechanism, governance, and indicator labels plus readiness scores with evidence anchors. Reliability, stability, and uncertainty are assessed using Krippendorff alpha, weighted kappa, intraclass correlation, and bootstrap confidence intervals.

AI治理儿童权益可计算评估政策落地

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。