用信息论量化微调提取的预测结构,区分能力激发与新知识教学。
Excess Description Length of Learning Generalizable Predictors
- 基于预序编码定义超额描述长度(EDL),衡量微调写入模型的结构量。
- 随机标签下EDL接近零,罕见样本贡献对泛化影响小。
- 适合研究模型能力演化、泛化性能与微调机制的学者。
理解微调是激发潜在能力还是教授新知识,是语言模型评估与安全性的根本问题。我们建立了一个形式化信息论框架,用于量化微调从训练数据集中提取的预测结构并写入模型参数的程度。核心指标为超额描述长度(EDL),通过预序编码定义,测量使用不断更新的模型(在线训练)逐序列编码训练标签所需的比特数,与最终模型下残差编码成本之间的差距。我们证明了EDL在期望上非负,在无限数据极限下收敛至过剩描述长度,并提供预期泛化增益的边界。通过一系列简化模型,我们澄清了学习中的常见误解:为何随机标签导致EDL接近零;单个样本如何消除大量关于数据分布规则的不确定性;稀有输入所学结构对预期泛化贡献有限;格式学习引发早期瞬态,不同于能力获取。该框架为经验观察提供了严格基础,即能力激发与教学表现出定性不同的缩放特征。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Understanding whether fine-tuning elicits latent capabilities or teaches new ones is a fundamental question for language model evaluation and safety. We develop a formal information-theoretic framework for quantifying how much predictive structure fine-tuning extracts from the train dataset and writes into a model's parameters. Our central quantity, Excess Description Length (EDL), is defined via prequential coding and measures the gap between the bits required to encode training labels sequentially using an evolving model (trained online) and the residual encoding cost under the final trained model. We establish that EDL is non-negative in expectation, converges to surplus description length in the infinite-data limit, and provides bounds on expected generalization gain. Through a series of toy models, we clarify common confusions about information in learning: why random labels yield EDL near zero, how a single example can eliminate many bits of uncertainty about the underlying rule(s) that describe the data distribution, why structure learned on rare inputs contributes proportionally little to expected generalization, and how format learning creates early transients distinct from capability acquisition. This framework provides rigorous foundations for the empirical observation that capability elicitation and teaching exhibit qualitatively distinct scaling signatures.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。