从技术到社会,系统分析智能体AI的深层影响与治理挑战
Socio-technical aspects of Agentic AI
- 用MAD-BAD-SAD框架连接技术设计与社会影响
- 揭示感知、规划等模块背后的数据治理与安全风险
- 适合关注AI伦理、政策与跨领域应用的研究者
智能体人工智能(Agentic AI)代表了智能系统设计的根本性转变,其由相互关联的组件构成,具备自主感知、推理、规划、行动和学习能力。现有研究多聚焦于系统架构、推理机制、协调策略及跨领域性能,但对社会、伦理、经济、环境与治理影响的整合仍不足。本文通过社会技术分析,将核心技术组件与社会背景明确关联,探讨感知、认知、规划、执行和记忆中的架构选择如何引出数据治理、问责、透明度、安全性和可持续性等依赖关系。采用MAD-BAD-SAD分析框架,涵盖动机、应用与道德困境(MAD)、偏见、问责与危险(BAD)、社会影响、采纳与设计考量(SAD)。分析当前智能体AI在医疗、教育、工业、智慧可持续城市、社会服务、通信网络及地球观测与卫星通信等领域的表现,识别开放挑战并提出未来研究方向。强调智能体AI是算法、数据、组织实践、监管框架与社会规范共同塑造的综合性系统。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents a fundamental shift in the design of intelligent systems, characterized by interconnected components that collectively enable autonomous perception, reasoning, planning, action, and learning. Recent research on agentic AI has largely focused on technical foundations, including system architectures, reasoning and planning mechanisms, coordination strategies, and application-level performance across domains. However, the societal, ethical, economic, environmental, and governance implications of agentic AI remain weakly integrated into these technical treatments. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a socio-technical analysis of agentic AI that explicitly connects core technical components with societal context. We examine how architectural choices in perception, cognition, planning, execution, and memory introduce dependencies related to data governance, accountability, transparency, safety, and sustainability. To structure this analysis, we adopt the MAD-BAD-SAD construct as an analytical lens, capturing motivations, applications, and moral dilemmas (MAD); biases, accountability, and dangers (BAD); and societal impact, adoption, and design considerations (SAD). Using this lens, we analyze ethical considerations, implications, and challenges arising from contemporary agentic AI systems and assess their manifestation across emerging applications, including healthcare, education, industry, smart and sustainable cities, social services, communications and networking, and earth observation and satellite communications. The paper further identifies open challenges and suggests future research directions, framing agentic AI as an integrated socio-technical system whose behavior and impact are co-produced by algorithms, data, organizational practices, regulatory frameworks, and social norms.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。