arXiv:2601.08013cs.LG2026-01

用Transformer预测未来航段时长,提升航运调度可靠性。

Beyond the Next Port: A Multi-Task Transformer for Forecasting Future Voyage Segment Durations

  • 构建多任务Transformer模型,融合历史航程、港口拥堵与船体信息。
  • 相比深度学习模型,误差降低4.70%(MAE)至39.49%(MAPE)。
  • 适合航运公司、港口管理者优化长期运营计划。

准确预测航段级航行时长是提升海上航程可靠性与优化长期港口运营的基础。然而,传统到达时间(ETA)模型主要针对下一个停靠港,且严重依赖实时自动识别系统(AIS)数据,而这些数据在预测未来航段时无法获取。为此,研究将未来港口到达时间预测重构为航段级时间序列预测问题。提出一种基于Transformer的架构,整合历史航行时长、目的港拥堵代理变量和静态船舶特征。模型采用因果掩码注意力机制捕捉长程时间依赖,并通过多任务学习头联合预测航段航行时长与港口拥堵状态,利用共享潜在信号缓解高不确定性。在2021年全球真实数据集上的评估显示,该模型持续优于多种基准方法:相较于序列深度学习模型,平均绝对误差(MAE)降低4.70%,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)降低4.95%,均方根误差(RMSE)降低2.59%;相较于梯度提升机,MAE降低7.03%,MAPE降低39.49%,RMSE降低4.37%。对一个主要目的地港口的案例研究进一步验证了其卓越精度。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Accurate forecasts of segment-level sailing durations are fundamental to enhancing maritime schedule reliability and optimizing long-term port operations. However, conventional estimated time of arrival (ETA) models are primarily designed for the immediate next port of call and rely heavily on real-time automatic identification system (AIS) data, which is inherently unavailable for future voyage segments. To address this gap, the study reformulates future-port ETA prediction as a segment-level time-series forecasting problem. We develop a transformer-based architecture that integrates historical sailing durations, destination port congestion proxies, and static vessel descriptors. The proposed framework employs a causally masked attention mechanism to capture long-range temporal dependencies and a multi-task learning head to jointly predict segment sailing durations and port congestion states, leveraging shared latent signals to mitigate high uncertainty. Evaluation on a real-world global dataset from 2021 demonstrates the proposed model consistently outperforms a comprehensive suite of competitive baselines. The result shows a relative reduction of 4.70% in mean absolute error (MAE), 4.95% in mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and 2.59% in root mean squared error (RMSE) compared with sequential deep learning models. The relative reductions compared with gradient boosting machines are 7.03% in MAE, 39.49% in MAPE and 4.37% in RMSE. The case study conducted on one major destination port further illustrates the model's superior accuracy.

航运预测Transformer多任务学习时间序列

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。