arXiv:2601.08857cs.SEcs.AI2026-01被引 2

AI编程工具普及下,重构软件工程教育与学术诚信体系。

Revisiting Software Engineering Education in the Era of Large Language Models: A Curriculum Adaptation and Academic Integrity Framework

  • 提出AI融入教学的课程设计模型,强调批判与人机协作能力。
  • 传统抄袭检测失效,需转向过程透明化的学术诚信机制。
  • 适合关注AI时代教育改革的高校教师与课程设计者。

大型语言模型(如ChatGPT、GitHub Copilot)正重塑软件工程实践,降低代码生成、解释与测试成本,推动任务自动化。然而,多数计算机与软件工程课程仍以手工编码能力作为技术素养标准,造成教学与现实脱节,影响评估有效性与学习成果。本文基于概念研究方法,构建理论框架,分析生成式AI如何改变核心工程能力,并提出适配LLM环境的教学生态设计模型。研究聚焦土耳其高校,其集中化管理、大班授课与应试评估加剧了挑战。框架指出:问题分析、设计、实现与测试正从构建转向批判、验证与人机共治。同时,传统以抄袭为核心的学术诚信机制已不适用,亟需转向过程透明模型。本文为课程改革提供结构化方案,但属理论探讨,呼吁开展纵向实证研究以评估长期影响。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot, into professional workflows is increasingly reshaping software engineering practices. These tools have lowered the cost of code generation, explanation, and testing, while introducing new forms of automation into routine development tasks. In contrast, most of the software engineering and computer engineering curricula remain closely aligned with pedagogical models that equate manual syntax production with technical competence. This growing misalignment raises concerns regarding assessment validity, learning outcomes, and the development of foundational skills. Adopting a conceptual research approach, this paper proposes a theoretical framework for analyzing how generative AI alters core software engineering competencies and introduces a pedagogical design model for LLM-integrated education. Attention is given to computer engineering programs in Turkey, where centralized regulation, large class sizes, and exam-oriented assessment practices amplify these challenges. The framework delineates how problem analysis, design, implementation, and testing increasingly shift from construction toward critique, validation, and human-AI stewardship. In addition, the paper argues that traditional plagiarism-centric integrity mechanisms are becoming insufficient, motivating a transition toward a process transparency model. While this work provides a structured proposal for curriculum adaptation, it remains a theoretical contribution; the paper concludes by outlining the need for longitudinal empirical studies to evaluate these interventions and their long-term impacts on learning.

AI教育课程改革学术诚信软件工程

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。