arXiv:2601.09750cs.SEcs.AI2026-01

让大模型动态调用新工具,实现高效多智能体协作解题。

SAGE: Tool-Augmented LLM Task Solving Strategies in Scalable Multi-Agent Environments

  • 基于OPACA框架实现工具的动态发现与调用
  • 支持多模型、多提示策略灵活切换,提升任务解决效率
  • 开源完整框架与评测数据,适合开发和研究者使用

大语言模型在问答任务中表现良好,但现实应用常需访问实时信息或执行操作。为此,可为模型扩展工具,但传统方式依赖预先定义,难以应对快速变化的软件环境。针对领域或企业定制工具的集成难题,本文提出SAGE——一个基于OPACA框架的对话式AI接口,支持动态添加新工具并实现零样本提示。SAGE具备高度可扩展性和模块化设计,可无缝切换GPT、LLAMA等模型,并灵活组合不同提示策略与智能体配置,实现工具选择、执行与结果评估。我们实现了多种复杂度的任务求解策略,并在一组综合性基准服务上进行了评估,结果表明各策略各有优劣。相关代码、框架及评测数据均已开源。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models (LLMs) have proven to work well in question-answering scenarios, but real-world applications often require access to tools for live information or actuation. For this, LLMs can be extended with tools, which are often defined in advance, also allowing for some fine-tuning for specific use cases. However, rapidly evolving software landscapes and individual services require the constant development and integration of new tools. Domain- or company-specific tools can greatly elevate the usefulness of an LLM, but such custom tools can be problematic to integrate, or the LLM may fail to reliably understand and use them. For this, we need strategies to define new tools and integrate them into the LLM dynamically, as well as robust and scalable zero-shot prompting methods that can make use of those tools in an efficient manner. In this paper, we present SAGE, a specialized conversational AI interface, based on the OPACA framework for tool discovery and execution. The integration with OPACA makes it easy to add new tools or services for the LLM to use, while SAGE itself presents rich extensibility and modularity. This not only provides the ability to seamlessly switch between different models (e.g. GPT, LLAMA), but also to add and select prompting methods, involving various setups of differently prompted agents for selecting and executing tools and evaluating the results. We implemented a number of task-solving strategies, making use of agentic concepts and prompting methods in various degrees of complexity, and evaluated those against a comprehensive set of benchmark services. The results are promising and highlight the distinct strengths and weaknesses of different task-solving strategies. Both SAGE and the OPACA framework, as well as the different benchmark services and results, are available as Open Source/Open Data on GitHub.

多智能体工具调用大模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。