用几何验证提升视觉语言模型的空间推理可信度
Predicting When to Trust Vision-Language Models for Spatial Reasoning
- 通过物体检测实现独立几何校验,融合四类视觉信号判断可信度
- 在BLIP-2上达0.674 AUROC,比文本基线提升34%
- 适合需要安全决策的机器人与自动驾驶系统
视觉语言模型(VLMs)在多模态任务中表现优异,但在空间推理上存在系统性缺陷,对基本方向关系的准确率仅达49%(CLIP)至54%(BLIP-2)。为确保其在机器人和自动驾驶系统中的安全应用,需预测何时可信任其空间判断。本文提出一种基于视觉的置信度估计框架,通过物体检测进行独立几何验证。该方法不依赖文本自评估,而是融合四类信号:VLM主张与坐标间的几何一致性、重叠导致的空间模糊性、检测质量及VLM内部不确定性,采用梯度提升融合。在BLIP-2上实现0.674 AUROC(较文本基线提升34.0%),在CLIP上达0.583 AUROC(提升16.1%),且适用于生成式与分类架构。该框架支持选择性预测:当目标准确率达60%时,覆盖率达61.9%,相比基线27.6%提升2.2倍。特征分析显示,视觉信号贡献87.4%的重要性,远超VLM置信度的12.7%,证实外部几何验证优于自我评估。实验表明,基于置信度剪枝可将场景图精度从52.1%提升至78.3%,同时保留68.2%的边。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities across multimodal tasks, yet exhibit systematic spatial reasoning failures, achieving only 49% (CLIP) to 54% (BLIP-2) accuracy on basic directional relationships. For safe deployment in robotics and autonomous systems, we need to predict when to trust VLM spatial predictions rather than accepting all outputs. We propose a vision-based confidence estimation framework that validates VLM predictions through independent geometric verification using object detection. Unlike text-based approaches relying on self-assessment, our method fuses four signals via gradient boosting: geometric alignment between VLM claims and coordinates, spatial ambiguity from overlap, detection quality, and VLM internal uncertainty. We achieve 0.674 AUROC on BLIP-2 (34.0% improvement over text-based baselines) and 0.583 AUROC on CLIP (16.1% improvement), generalizing across generative and classification architectures. Our framework enables selective prediction: at 60% target accuracy, we achieve 61.9% coverage versus 27.6% baseline (2.2x improvement) on BLIP-2. Feature analysis reveals vision-based signals contribute 87.4% of model importance versus 12.7% from VLM confidence, validating that external geometric verification outperforms self-assessment. We demonstrate reliable scene graph construction where confidence-based pruning improves precision from 52.1% to 78.3% while retaining 68.2% of edges.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。