综述视觉语言模型对抗防御的三大策略及其优劣。
Adversarial Defense in Vision-Language Models: An Overview
- 分三类防御:训练时、推理时、无训练,各有侧重
- 无训练方法不改模型,仅扰动输入或特征,计算开销低
- 适合关注模型安全与鲁棒性的研究者与工程师
视觉语言模型(如 CLIP)的广泛应用引发了对其对复杂且难以察觉的对抗攻击脆弱性的担忧。这类攻击可能损害跨模态任务中的模型性能与系统安全。为应对挑战,提出了三种主要防御范式:训练时防御通过对抗微调增强鲁棒性,虽有效但需大量计算资源且泛化能力有限;测试时自适应防御在推理阶段更新参数以应对未标记的对抗样本,灵活性高但增加复杂度与计算开销;训练无关防御不修改模型,而是改变对抗输入或其特征嵌入,通过施加输入扰动来减轻攻击影响,无需额外训练。本文综述了视觉语言模型对抗防御的最新进展,分析各类方法的优势与局限,并讨论提升模型鲁棒性的持续挑战。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The widespread use of Vision Language Models (VLMs, e.g. CLIP) has raised concerns about their vulnerability to sophisticated and imperceptible adversarial attacks. These attacks could compromise model performance and system security in cross-modal tasks. To address this challenge, three main defense paradigms have been proposed: Training-time Defense, Test-time Adaptation Defense, and Training-free Defense. Training-time Defense involves modifying the training process, typically through adversarial fine-tuning to improve the robustness to adversarial examples. While effective, this approach requires substantial computational resources and may not generalize across all adversarial attacks. Test-time Adaptation Defense focuses on adapting the model at inference time by updating its parameters to handle unlabeled adversarial examples, offering flexibility but often at the cost of increased complexity and computational overhead. Training-free Defense avoids modifying the model itself, instead focusing on altering the adversarial inputs or their feature embeddings, which enforces input perturbations to mitigate the impact of attacks without additional training. This survey reviews the latest advancements in adversarial defense strategies for VLMs, highlighting the strengths and limitations of such approaches and discussing ongoing challenges in enhancing the robustness of VLMs.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。