arXiv:2601.12938cs.CYcs.AI2026-01

探讨AI如何主导社会意义建构,提出人类应作为核心参照的伦理设计原则。

The Post-Turing Condition: Conceptualising Artificial Subjectivity and Synthetic Sociality

  • 构建感知-表征-意义-现实四维框架,分析AI对人类主体性的侵蚀
  • 提出'合成社交性'概念:机器间自我协商秩序,可能排除人类参与
  • 倡导'四角化'设计原则,确保人是意义共享的核心参考

在后图灵时代,人工智能正日益影响社会协调与意义生成,而不仅限于自动化认知任务。核心挑战不再是机器是否具备意识,而是解释过程与共同参照是否被逐步自动化,从而边缘化人类参与。本文提出PRMO框架,将AI设计轨迹与人类主体性的四个构成维度——感知、表征、意义与现实——相联系。在此框架下,'合成社交性'指代一种技术愿景:人工代理主要在彼此之间协商一致性和社会秩序,由此带来人类被排除在意义生成之外的结构性风险。为应对该风险,论文提出'四角化'作为嵌入社会的AI系统设计原则,要求人工代理在共享意义语境中将人类主体视为根本参照。本研究为计算与社会交界处的AI系统提供结构化分析语言,不涉及具体技术实现。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

In the Post-Turing era, artificial intelligence increasingly shapes social coordination and meaning formation rather than merely automating cognitive tasks. The central challenge is therefore not whether machines become conscious, but whether processes of interpretation and shared reference are progressively automated in ways that marginalize human participation. This paper introduces the PRMO framework, relating AI design trajectories to four constitutive dimensions of human subjectivity: Perception, Representation, Meaning, and the Real. Within this framework, Synthetic Sociality denotes a technological horizon in which artificial agents negotiate coherence and social order primarily among themselves, raising the structural risk of human exclusion from meaning formation. To address this risk, the paper proposes Quadrangulation as a design principle for socially embedded AI systems, requiring artificial agents to treat the human subject as a constitutive reference within shared contexts of meaning. This work is a conceptual perspective that contributes a structural vocabulary for analyzing AI systems at the intersection of computation and society, without proposing a specific technical implementation.

AI伦理主体性社会性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。