让团队协作分析更透明深入，支持反思与建设性分歧。
Reflexis: Supporting Reflexivity and Rigor in Collaborative Qualitative Analysis through Design for Deliberation
- 内置即时反思提示，推动研究者持续自我觉察。
- 12组分析师实验显示，分歧被转化为有位置意识的对话。
- 适合注重研究严谨性的质性分析团队使用。
反思性主题分析（RTA）是生成深层解释性洞见的关键方法。然而，现有软件工具往往忽视研究者反思、分析过程的可追溯性以及建设性分歧等核心原则，过度追求速度与共识。为此，我们提出 Reflexis，一个以这些实践为核心的协作空间。它通过内嵌的即时反思提示支持研究者反思，使编码演化过程可视化，将分歧转化为具有位置意识的建设性对话。12组配对分析师的实证研究表明，Reflexis促使参与者进行更细致的反思，并将意见分歧转化为富有成效的交流。评估还揭示了设计张力，如对更高层次网络化备忘录的需求，以及对主动提醒触发时机的更多控制需求。Reflexis 提供了一个以严谨性和透明度为核心的设计框架，助力自动化时代下的深度协作解读。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a critical method for generating deep interpretive insights. Yet its core tenets, including researcher reflexivity, tangible analytical evolution, and productive disagreement, are often poorly supported by software tools that prioritize speed and consensus over interpretive depth. To address this gap, we introduce Reflexis, a collaborative workspace that centers these practices. It supports reflexivity by integrating in-situ reflection prompts, makes code evolution transparent and tangible, and scaffolds collaborative interpretation by turning differences into productive, positionality-aware dialogue. Results from our paired-analyst study (N=12) indicate that Reflexis encouraged participants toward more granular reflection and reframed disagreements as productive conversations. The evaluation also surfaced key design tensions, including a desire for higher-level, networked memos and more user control over the timing of proactive alerts. Reflexis contributes a design framework for tools that prioritize rigor and transparency to support deep, collaborative interpretation in an age of automation.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。