用多角色模拟评估帮设计师看清不同骑行者需求冲突
StreetDesignAI: Broadening Designer Perspectives Through Multi-Persona Evaluation of Cycling Infrastructure
- 通过真实街景与地图数据,模拟不同骑行者视角的反馈
- 26名专业人士测试显示,系统显著提升对多元需求的理解
- 适合交通设计、城市规划从业者用于优化人性化基础设施
自行车基础设施设计需平衡多样用户需求,但设计师常难以预判不同骑行者对同一道路环境的体验差异。基于12位领域专家的前期研究及427名骑行者的众包可骑行性评估,我们提出StreetDesignAI——一个交互式系统,支持设计师(1)依托图像与地图数据在真实街道语境中评估;(2)同时获取从自信到谨慎等不同骑行者角色的并行反馈;(3)在迭代修改设计时,系统自动揭示各视角间的矛盾。26名交通专业人士的对照实验表明,相较于通用AI聊天机器人,该系统显著拓宽了设计师对各类骑行者视角的理解,增强了识别多元需求的能力,并提升了将需求转化为设计决策的信心。参与者满意度与专业使用意愿也显著更高。定性分析显示,显式暴露冲突促使设计探索从单一视角优化转向有意识的权衡决策。本研究为以冲突为交互原语的、支持角色意识的设计辅助工具提供了启示。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Designing cycling infrastructure requires balancing the competing needs of diverse user groups, yet designers often struggle to anticipate how different cyclists experience the same street environment. We investigate how persona-based evaluation can support cycling infrastructure design by making experiential conflicts explicit during the design process. Informed by a formative study with 12 domain experts and crowdsourced bikeability assessments from 427 cyclists, we present StreetDesignAI, an interactive system that enables designers to (1) ground evaluation in real street context through imagery and map data, (2) receive parallel feedback from simulated cyclist personas spanning confident to cautious users, and (3) iteratively modify designs while the system surfaces conflicts across perspectives. A within-subjects study with 26 transportation professionals comparing StreetDesignAI against a general-purpose AI chatbot demonstrates that structured multi-perspective feedback significantly Broaden designers' understanding of various cyclists' perspectives, ability to identify diverse persona needs, and confidence in translating those needs into design decisions. Participants also reported significantly higher overall satisfaction and stronger intention to use the system in professional practice. Qualitative findings further illuminate how explicit conflict surfacing transforms design exploration from single-perspective optimization toward deliberate trade-off reasoning. We discuss implications for AI-assisted tools that scaffold persona-aware design through disagreement as an interaction primitive.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。