评测大模型在中英术语混用场景下的表现，发现模型偏好与专业习惯有差距。

Large language models increasingly mediate multilingual professional communication, where useful generation requires adapting to community conventions about which expressions are retained, translated, or mixed. Existing benchmarks rarely isolate such community-conditioned choices. We introduce ChiEngMixBench, a controlled benchmark for Chinese AI/CS discourse, where Chinese frames routinely incorporate established English technical terms. Built from public technical discussions, it contains 1,706 source-derived candidate pairs covering 1,344 non-empty normalized terms, including a 1,167-pair strict subset that fixes the Chinese prefix and syntactic position while varying only the terminology form. The benchmark combines paired likelihood comparisons with a transparent reference-profile diagnostic for open-ended responses. Across nine open-weight models, Chinese equivalents receive higher likelihood on most pairs, revealing a gap between source-attested usage and model preference. Specialized terms show a small directional lift that is not robust after frequency and length controls and multiple-comparison correction. Human evaluation and baseline analyses show that reference-profile conformity is informative under the intended mixed-style rubric but does not reliably predict holistic response preference. ChiEngMixBench provides a reusable testbed for community-specific multilingual conventions with explicit diagnostic boundaries.