arXiv:2601.17018cs.CYcs.AI2026-01被引 2

研究高校课程中四大能力的发展,发现沟通与批判思维最易提升,协作最难维持。

Evaluating the Evolution of Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication and Collaboration in Higher Education Courses

  • 基于三个试点案例对比分析4Cs能力变化模式。
  • 沟通与批判思维在基线低的试点中提升显著,创造力和协作则表现不一。
  • 强调教学设计对能力发展起决定作用,适合教育研究者与课程开发者。

当代以能力为导向的教育核心目标是培养创造力、沟通力、批判性思维与协作能力(4Cs)。然而,关于这些能力在学习模块与教学阶段中的演变过程,实证证据仍有限。本研究通过项目提出的4Cs理论框架,分析了三个教育情境(IASIS、EASD、UPATRAS)从预试点到试点实施阶段的4Cs发展情况。结果表明,沟通力与批判性思维呈现最稳定且显著的提升,尤其在预试点基线较低的情境中,说明结构化试点干预有效促进认知与表达能力发展。相比之下,创造力表现出明显的语境依赖性,而协作能力最为脆弱,常在推广阶段出现停滞甚至退步。结合理论框架解读,说明能力演化主要受教学设计、评估一致性及学习活动结构影响,而非学习者自身能力。研究为4Cs框架提供了实证支持,并强调在扩展教育模块时需采用差异化、能力敏感的设计与评估策略。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The development of Creativity, Communication, Critical Thinking, and Collaboration (the 4Cs) is a central objective of contemporary competency-based education. However, empirical evidence on how these competencies evolve across learning modules and instructional phases remains limited. This study evaluates the evolution of the 4Cs from pre-pilot to pilot implementation phases across three educational contexts, using the project's 4Cs theoretical framework as an analytical lens. The analysis of three pilot cases (IASIS, EASD, and UPATRAS) compares the 4Cs scores to identify patterns of growth, stagnation, or decline over time. Results indicate that communication and critical thinking showed the most consistent and substantial improvements, particularly in pilots with lower pre-pilot baselines, suggesting that structured pilot interventions effectively support cognitive and expressive competencies. In contrast, creativity exhibited context-dependent outcomes, while collaboration emerged as the most fragile competency, often stagnating or declining during scale-up. Interpreted through the theoretical framework, these findings suggest that competency evolution is strongly shaped by instructional design, assessment alignment, and learning activity structures rather than learner ability alone. The study contributes empirical validation to the 4Cs framework and highlights the need for differentiated, competency-sensitive design and evaluation strategies when scaling educational modules.

4Cs能力教育评估教学设计能力发展

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。