arXiv:2601.17219cs.RO2026-01

构建人机协作施工的改进能力分级体系,推动机器人从执行到共创的跃迁。

Advancing Improvisation in Human-Robot Construction Collaboration: Taxonomy and Research Roadmap

  • 提出六级人机协作改进能力分类,从人工操作到真正协同创新
  • 214篇文献分析显示当前研究多集中于低层级,缺乏经验学习与协作进化
  • 强调虚实交互、大模型与云知识系统是突破人机协作瓶颈的关键

建筑业面临生产率停滞、技术工人短缺和安全问题。尽管机器人自动化提供解决方案,但现有施工机器人难以适应非结构化、动态的现场环境。关键在于“即兴应变”——通过创造性解决问题应对突发状况,这目前仍主要由人类完成。在不可预测的施工环境中,人机协同即兴合作对保障作业连续性至关重要。本研究基于214篇2010-2025年文献的系统综述,构建六级分类体系,涵盖:手动作业(Level 0)、人控执行(Level 1)、自适应操作(Level 2)、模仿学习(Level 3)、人参与的BIM流程(Level 4)、云知识集成(Level 5)以及真正的协同即兴(Level 6)。分析表明,当前研究集中于低层级,缺乏经验学习能力,向协同即兴演进受限。五维雷达框架揭示规划、认知角色、物理执行、学习能力与即兴能力的渐进演化路径,证明互补性人机能力可实现团队绩效超越个体之和。研究识别三大核心障碍:接地与对话推理的技术局限、人类即兴与机器人研究间的概念鸿沟、方法论挑战。建议未来研究聚焦增强人机沟通,通过增强/虚拟现实界面、大语言模型及云知识系统推进真正协同即兴。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The construction industry faces productivity stagnation, skilled labor shortages, and safety concerns. While robotic automation offers solutions, construction robots struggle to adapt to unstructured, dynamic sites. Central to this is improvisation, adapting to unexpected situations through creative problem-solving, which remains predominantly human. In construction's unpredictable environments, collaborative human-robot improvisation is essential for workflow continuity. This research develops a six-level taxonomy classifying human-robot collaboration (HRC) based on improvisation capabilities. Through systematic review of 214 articles (2010-2025), we categorize construction robotics across: Manual Work (Level 0), Human-Controlled Execution (Level 1), Adaptive Manipulation (Level 2), Imitation Learning (Level 3), Human-in-Loop BIM Workflow (Level 4), Cloud-Based Knowledge Integration (Level 5), and True Collaborative Improvisation (Level 6). Analysis reveals current research concentrates at lower levels, with critical gaps in experiential learning and limited progression toward collaborative improvisation. A five-dimensional radar framework illustrates progressive evolution of Planning, Cognitive Role, Physical Execution, Learning Capability, and Improvisation, demonstrating how complementary human-robot capabilities create team performance exceeding individual contributions. The research identifies three fundamental barriers: technical limitations in grounding and dialogic reasoning, conceptual gaps between human improvisation and robotics research, and methodological challenges. We recommend future research emphasizing improved human-robot communication via Augmented/Virtual Reality interfaces, large language model integration, and cloud-based knowledge systems to advance toward true collaborative improvisation.

人机协作施工机器人即兴应变分级体系

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。