首次系统评估DPO在医疗视觉语言模型中的表现,发现其效果不稳定且难纠错。
Benchmarking Direct Preference Optimization for Medical Large Vision-Language Models

- 对比9种DPO变体,测试其在两种医疗模型上的对齐效果
- 现有DPO在视觉问答任务上仅提升3.6%,且仍常犯视觉误判错误
- 提出针对性偏好构建策略,有效减少视觉误判,适合医疗AI研究者参考
大型视觉语言模型(LVLMs)在医疗应用中前景广阔,但部署常受限于对齐不足与可靠性差。尽管直接偏好优化(DPO)已成为一种有效的模型微调框架,其在高风险医疗场景中的实际效果尚未充分验证,缺乏足够的实证基础以指导未来方法发展。为此,我们首次全面评估了多种DPO变体在医疗领域的表现,涵盖九种不同形式,在两个医疗LVLMs——LLaVA-Med与HuatuoGPT-Vision上进行测试。结果表明:当前DPO方法在多数任务中仅带来有限收益,性能随任务与模型架构差异显著;且未能有效解决常见的视觉误判问题。基于此,我们提出一种针对视觉误判的偏好构造策略,作为概念验证,使模型在视觉问答任务上相较最强基线提升3.6%。为促进后续研究,我们开源完整框架,包括训练数据、模型检查点及代码库(https://github.com/dmis-lab/med-vlm-dpo)。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) hold significant promise for medical applications, yet their deployment is often constrained by insufficient alignment and reliability. While Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a potent framework for refining model responses, its efficacy in high-stakes medical contexts remains underexplored, lacking the rigorous empirical groundwork necessary to guide future methodological advances. To bridge this gap, we present the first comprehensive examination of diverse DPO variants within the medical domain, evaluating nine distinct formulations across two medical LVLMs: LLaVA-Med and HuatuoGPT-Vision. Our results reveal several critical limitations: current DPO approaches often yield inconsistent gains over supervised fine-tuning, with their efficacy varying significantly across different tasks and backbones. Furthermore, they frequently fail to resolve fundamental visual misinterpretation errors. Building on these insights, we present a targeted preference construction strategy as a proof-of-concept that explicitly addresses visual misinterpretation errors frequently observed in existing DPO models. This design yields a 3.6% improvement over the strongest existing DPO baseline on visual question-answering tasks. To support future research, we release our complete framework, including all training data, model checkpoints, and our codebase at https://github.com/dmis-lab/med-vlm-dpo.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。