研究人如何因机器人像人而产生道德反应，揭示情感与伦理的双重影响。
Whether We Care, How We Reason: The Dual Role of Anthropomorphism and Moral Foundations in Robot Abuse
- 通过不同类别人形机器人实验，测试人类对机器人虐待的反应
- 高拟人度引发更强道德关切，进步主义倾向者更关注未来影响
- 适合伦理设计、人机交互与政策制定者参考
随着机器人日益融入日常生活，理解人们对机器人受虐行为的反应具有重要的伦理和设计意义。本混合方法研究（N=201）探讨了拟人化程度与道德基础如何影响人们对机器人虐待的反应。参与者观看不同类别人形机器人（蜘蛛型、双足型、类人型）遭受物理虐待的视频，并完成道德基础、愤怒感与社会距离的测量。结果表明，拟人化程度决定了人们是否将道德关怀延伸至机器人，而道德基础则影响其推理方式。定性分析显示：低进步主义个体采用基于性格的判断，高进步主义个体则进行面向未来的道德反思。研究为机器人设计与政策沟通提供启示。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
As robots become increasingly integrated into daily life, understanding responses to robot mistreatment carries important ethical and design implications. This mixed-methods study (N = 201) examined how anthropomorphic levels and moral foundations shape reactions to robot abuse. Participants viewed videos depicting physical mistreatment of robots varying in humanness (Spider, Twofoot, Humanoid) and completed measures assessing moral foundations, anger, and social distance. Results revealed that anthropomorphism determines whether people extend moral consideration to robots, while moral foundations shape how they reason about such consideration. Qualitative analysis revealed distinct reasoning patterns: low-progressivism individuals employed character-based judgments, while high-progressivism individuals engaged in future-oriented moral deliberation. Findings offer implications for robot design and policy communication.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。