arXiv:2601.20367cs.LGcs.SY2026-01被引 1

用Transformer模型无监督检测交通异常,发现388个传统方法遗漏的风险场景。

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction via Transformer-Based Models

  • 基于多智能体Transformer建模正常驾驶,通过预测残差识别异常。
  • 在NGSIM数据集上实现最高物理安全性对齐,检测到388个新异常。
  • 可区分四类可解释风险类型,适合自动驾驶仿真测试优化。

识别安全关键场景对自动驾驶至关重要,但此类事件罕见,难以进行监督标注。传统基于规则的指标(如碰撞前时间)过于简单,无法捕捉复杂交互风险,且现有方法缺乏系统性验证机制以确认统计异常是否真正反映物理危险。为此,我们提出一种基于多智能体Transformer的无监督异常检测框架,通过建模正常驾驶行为并利用预测残差度量偏离程度。设计双评估方案:稳定性采用标准排序指标,包括肯德尔等级相关系数和交并比衡量前K项的一致性;物理对齐性则通过与既有替代安全度量(SSM)的相关性评估。在NGSIM数据集上的实验表明,最大残差聚合器在保持稳定性的前提下达到最高物理对齐性。此外,该框架识别出388个被碰撞前时间和统计基线遗漏的异常,捕捉了如侧向漂移下的反应制动等细微多智能体风险。检测结果进一步聚类为四类可解释风险类型,为仿真与测试提供可操作洞察。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Identifying safety-critical scenarios is essential for autonomous driving, but the rarity of such events makes supervised labeling impractical. Traditional rule-based metrics like Time-to-Collision are too simplistic to capture complex interaction risks, and existing methods lack a systematic way to verify whether statistical anomalies truly reflect physical danger. To address this gap, we propose an unsupervised anomaly detection framework based on a multi-agent Transformer that models normal driving and measures deviations through prediction residuals. A dual evaluation scheme has been proposed to assess both detection stability and physical alignment: Stability is measured using standard ranking metrics in which Kendall Rank Correlation Coefficient captures rank agreement and Jaccard index captures the consistency of the top-K selected items; Physical alignment is assessed through correlations with established Surrogate Safety Measures (SSM). Experiments on the NGSIM dataset demonstrate our framework's effectiveness: We show that the maximum residual aggregator achieves the highest physical alignment while maintaining stability. Furthermore, our framework identifies 388 unique anomalies missed by Time-to-Collision and statistical baselines, capturing subtle multi-agent risks like reactive braking under lateral drift. The detected anomalies are further clustered into four interpretable risk types, offering actionable insights for simulation and testing.

自动驾驶异常检测Transformer轨迹预测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。