用仿真框架评估预测模型对库存成本和服务水平的实际影响
Bridging Forecast Accuracy and Inventory KPIs: A Simulation-Based Software Framework
- 构建闭环仿真系统,融合需求生成、预测模型与库存模拟
- 发现预测准确率提升不等于库存成本降低或服务水平提高
- 适合汽车后市场、供应链管理等注重运营实效的研究者
在汽车后市场中,备件需求具有高度间歇性,不确定性带来显著的成本与服务风险。预测虽关键,但其优劣不应仅由统计误差(如MAE、RMSE)判断,而应看对总成本、服务等级等核心运营指标(KPI)的影响。然而,现有研究多仅以准确率评估模型,且二者关系尚不明确。为此,我们提出一种以决策为中心的仿真软件框架,可系统评估预测模型在真实库存管理场景中的表现。框架包含:(i) 针对备件需求特性的合成需求生成器,(ii) 可嵌入任意预测模型的灵活预测模块,(iii) 消费预测并计算运营KPI的库存控制模拟器。该闭环结构使研究人员能同时评估模型的统计误差与下游库存影响。通过大量仿真场景,我们发现准确率提升未必带来更好KPI,相似误差的模型也可能导致不同成本-服务权衡。我们分析差异成因,揭示预测性能如何影响库存结果,并为模型选择提供指导。整体上,框架连接需求预测与库存管理,推动评估从预测准确转向运营相关性,适用于汽车后市场及相关领域。开源实现已发布于https://github.com/caisr-hh/TruckParts-Demand-Inventory-Simulator/releases/tag/IDA_2026。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Efficient management of spare parts inventory is crucial in the automotive aftermarket, where demand is highly intermittent and uncertainty drives substantial cost and service risks. Forecasting is therefore central, but the quality of forecasting models should be judged not by statistical accuracy (e.g., MAE, RMSE) but rather by its impact on key operational performance indicators (KPIs), such as total cost and service level. Yet most existing work evaluates models exclusively using accuracy metrics, and the relationship between these metrics and KPIs remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we propose a decision-centric simulation software framework that enables systematic evaluation of forecasting models in realistic inventory management setting. The framework comprises: (i) a synthetic demand generator tailored to spare-parts demand characteristics, (ii) a flexible forecasting module that can host arbitrary predictive models, and (iii) an inventory control simulator that consumes the forecasts and computes operational KPIs. This closed-loop setup enables researchers to evaluate models not only in terms of statistical error but also in terms of downstream inventory implications. Using a wide range of simulation scenarios, we show that improvements in accuracy metrics do not necessarily lead to better KPIs, and that models with similar error profiles can induce different cost-service trade-offs. We analyze these discrepancies to characterize how forecast performance affects inventory outcomes and derive guidance for model selection. Overall, the framework links demand forecasting and inventory management, shifting evaluation from predictive accuracy toward operational relevance in the automotive aftermarket and related domains. An open-source implementation of the software is available at https://github.com/caisr-hh/TruckParts-Demand-Inventory-Simulator/releases/tag/IDA_2026.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。