arXiv:2601.22255cs.CYcs.AI2026-01被引 7

拆解AI叙事背后的权力与偏见,呼吁更务实的治理

AI Narrative Breakdown. A Critical Assessment of Power and Promise

  • 从技术史与社会学视角批判主流AI叙事
  • 揭示所有AI应用中隐含的政治与价值选择
  • 适合关注AI伦理与政策的读者

本文探讨了ChatGPT发布后不断演变的人工智能话语。通过批判计算机科学、数据与算法研究、科技与社会(STS)、数据保护理论、心灵哲学及符号学等领域的洞见,审视塑造公众对AI认知的关键叙事,包括自主性、决策权、真实性、知识处理、预测能力、通用性、中立性、非政治化优化、可持续性变革者、民主化、大规模失业,以及将AI视为乌托邦或反乌托邦的二元对立。文章首先梳理了人工智能话语的历史与技术背景,提出“时代精神AI”概念,批判“AI”一词在各领域被模糊且误导性地使用。接着,通过细致分析常见叙事,揭示其潜在的社会政治含义,并以实例展示所有AI应用中内在的政治性、权力渗透与价值取向。文章最后呼吁更扎实的AI参与方式,指出当前叙事忽视的关键问题,并提议构建新叙事:承认AI是人类主导的工具,必须接受社会规范与治理。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This article sets off for an exploration of the still evolving discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in the wake of the release of ChatGPT. It scrutinizes the pervasive narratives that are shaping the societal engagement with AI, spotlighting key themes such as agency and decision-making, autonomy, truthfulness, knowledge processing, prediction, general purpose, neutrality and objectivity, apolitical optimization, sustainability game-changer, democratization, mass unemployment, and the dualistic portrayal of AI as either a harbinger of societal utopia or dystopia. Those narratives are analysed critically based on insights from critical computer science, critical data and algorithm studies, from STS, data protection theory, as well as from the philosophy of mind and semiotics. To properly analyse the narratives presented, the article first delves into a historical and technical contextualisation of the AI discourse itself. The article then introduces the notion of "Zeitgeist AI" to critique the imprecise and misleading application of the term "AI" across various societal sectors. Then, by discussing common narratives with nuance, the article contextualises and challenges often assumed socio-political implications of AI, uncovering in detail and with examples the inherent political, power infused and value-laden decisions within all AI applications. Concluding with a call for a more grounded engagement with AI, the article carves out acute problems ignored by the narratives discussed and proposes new narratives recognizing AI as a human-directed tool necessarily subject to societal governance.

AI伦理社会影响批判研究

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。