arXiv:2602.00385cs.CV2026-02

对比YOLOv5与Faster R-CNN在自动驾驶目标检测中的表现

Deep Learning-Based Object Detection for Autonomous Vehicles: A Comparative Study of One-Stage and Two-Stage Detectors on Basic Traffic Objects

  • 采用真实与合成图像数据集,比较单阶段和双阶段检测器性能
  • YOLOv5在mAP、召回率和训练效率上更优,尤其在大图和大数据下
  • Faster R-CNN在小物体、远距离和弱光条件下表现更好

目标检测是自动驾驶系统的关键组件,使车辆能通过识别和定位周围物体来感知环境。利用先进成像与深度学习技术,系统可快速准确地基于特征识别物体。不同深度学习方法在检测分类能力上存在差异,选择合适方法显著影响系统性能、鲁棒性与效率。尽管已有YOLO、SSD、Faster R-CNN等通用架构,但其在特定自动驾驶场景下的适用性指导有限。本研究对两种主流检测模型——YOLOv5(单阶段)与Faster R-CNN(双阶段)进行综合实验分析。在融合真实与合成图像的多样化数据集上,评估了平均精度均值(mAP)、召回率与推理速度等指标。结果表明,随着数据集规模与图像分辨率增加,YOLOv5在mAP、召回率与训练效率上表现更优;而Faster R-CNN在检测小尺寸、远距离物体及复杂光照条件下更具优势。同时分析了不同置信度阈值与实际驾驶场景下的模型行为,为自动驾驶系统选型提供依据。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Object detection is a crucial component in autonomous vehicle systems. It enables the vehicle to perceive and understand its environment by identifying and locating various objects around it. By utilizing advanced imaging and deep learning techniques, autonomous vehicle systems can rapidly and accurately identify objects based on their features. Different deep learning methods vary in their ability to accurately detect and classify objects in autonomous vehicle systems. Selecting the appropriate method significantly impacts system performance, robustness, and efficiency in real-world driving scenarios. While several generic deep learning architectures like YOLO, SSD, and Faster R-CNN have been proposed, guidance on their suitability for specific autonomous driving applications is often limited. The choice of method affects detection accuracy, processing speed, environmental robustness, sensor integration, scalability, and edge case handling. This study provides a comprehensive experimental analysis comparing two prominent object detection models: YOLOv5 (a one-stage detector) and Faster R-CNN (a two-stage detector). Their performance is evaluated on a diverse dataset combining real and synthetic images, considering various metrics including mean Average Precision (mAP), recall, and inference speed. The findings reveal that YOLOv5 demonstrates superior performance in terms of mAP, recall, and training efficiency, particularly as dataset size and image resolution increase. However, Faster R-CNN shows advantages in detecting small, distant objects and performs well in challenging lighting conditions. The models' behavior is also analyzed under different confidence thresholds and in various real-world scenarios, providing insights into their applicability for autonomous driving systems.

目标检测自动驾驶YOLOv5Faster R-CNN

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。