构建可信赖的临床AI系统,需融合架构、MLOps与治理机制。
Engineering AI Agents for Clinical Workflows: A Case Study in Architecture,MLOps, and Governance
- 以代理为模块单元,实现自主的MLOps生命周期管理。
- 采用事件驱动架构提升系统韧性与审计可追溯性。
- 人机协同治理作为数据源,驱动系统持续优化。
人工智能在临床环境中的集成面临软件工程挑战,亟需从孤立模型转向稳健、可监管、可靠的系统。当前工业应用常受制于脆弱的原型架构与缺乏系统性监督,形成安全与责任缺失的“责任真空”。本文以初级医疗领域的生产级AI平台「Maria」为案例,提出可信临床AI依赖四大工程支柱的协同整合。通过结合清洁架构提升可维护性,事件驱动架构增强韧性与可审计性,将“代理”作为核心模块单元,赋予其独立的MLOps生命周期。同时,将“人在回路”治理模式技术化集成,不仅作为安全校验,更作为持续改进的关键事件驱动数据源。本研究提供了一套可复用的参考架构,为高风险领域中可维护、可扩展、可问责的AI系统开发提供实践指导。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into clinical settings presents a software engineering challenge, demanding a shift from isolated models to robust, governable, and reliable systems. However, brittle, prototype-derived architectures often plague industrial applications and a lack of systemic oversight, creating a ``responsibility vacuum'' where safety and accountability are compromised. This paper presents an industry case study of the ``Maria'' platform, a production-grade AI system in primary healthcare that addresses this gap. Our central hypothesis is that trustworthy clinical AI is achieved through the holistic integration of four foundational engineering pillars. We present a synergistic architecture that combines Clean Architecture for maintainability with an Event-driven architecture for resilience and auditability. We introduce the Agent as the primary unit of modularity, each possessing its own autonomous MLOps lifecycle. Finally, we show how a Human-in-the-Loop governance model is technically integrated not merely as a safety check, but as a critical, event-driven data source for continuous improvement. We present the platform as a reference architecture, offering practical lessons for engineers building maintainable, scalable, and accountable AI-enabled systems in high-stakes domains.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。