从实体与语义层面量化学术界与产业界知识距离,揭示协同演化规律。
Quantifying the Knowledge Proximity Between Academic and Industry Research: An Entity and Semantic Perspective
- 通过预训练模型提取细粒度知识单元,结合余弦相似度与网络分析测度重叠。
- 发现技术变革后双方知识距离缩短,学术主导地位在范式转移中减弱。
- 适用于研究产学研合作、科技政策制定者及创新生态分析者。
学术界与产业界存在相互塑造与动态反馈机制。尽管制度逻辑不同,双方在合作发表与人才流动上紧密互动,体现出制度分化与深度协作的张力。现有研究多依赖合作论文数或专利数等宏观指标,缺乏对文献中知识单元的细粒度分析,难以把握双方知识距离的精确演变,可能影响协作框架与资源配置效率。为此,本文从细粒度实体与语义空间出发,量化学术-产业共同演化的轨迹。在实体层面,利用预训练模型提取知识实体,通过余弦相似度衡量序列重合,并借助复杂网络分析拓扑特征;在语义层面,采用无监督对比学习,以跨机构文本相似性度量语义空间收敛。最后,通过引文分布模式分析双向知识流动与相似性的关联。结果表明,技术变革后双方知识距离显著缩小,提供双向适应的文本证据;且在技术范式转移期间,学术界的知识主导地位减弱。论文数据与代码可在 https://github.com/tinierZhao/Academic-Industrial-associations 获取。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The academia and industry are characterized by a reciprocal shaping and dynamic feedback mechanism. Despite distinct institutional logics, they have adapted closely in collaborative publishing and talent mobility, demonstrating tension between institutional divergence and intensive collaboration. Existing studies on their knowledge proximity mainly rely on macro indicators such as the number of collaborative papers or patents, lacking an analysis of knowledge units in the literature. This has led to an insufficient grasp of fine-grained knowledge proximity between industry and academia, potentially undermining collaboration frameworks and resource allocation efficiency. To remedy the limitation, this study quantifies the trajectory of academia-industry co-evolution through fine-grained entities and semantic space. In the entity measurement part, we extract fine-grained knowledge entities via pre-trained models, measure sequence overlaps using cosine similarity, and analyze topological features through complex network analysis. At the semantic level, we employ unsupervised contrastive learning to quantify convergence in semantic spaces by measuring cross-institutional textual similarities. Finally, we use citation distribution patterns to examine correlations between bidirectional knowledge flows and similarity. Analysis reveals that knowledge proximity between academia and industry rises, particularly following technological change. This provides textual evidence of bidirectional adaptation in co-evolution. Additionally, academia's knowledge dominance weakens during technological paradigm shifts. The dataset and code for this paper can be accessed at https://github.com/tinierZhao/Academic-Industrial-associations.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。