arXiv:2602.05935cs.LG2026-02被引 1

无需额外OOD数据,就能可靠训练出分布外检测器。

Tuning Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Detectors Without Given OOD Data

  • 提出无需外部OOD数据的检测器调优方法
  • 在高参数检测器上性能显著优于基线
  • 适合无法获取真实异常数据的场景

现有分布外(OOD)检测器通常依赖一个额外的、人为选定的OOD数据集进行调参。该数据集与神经网络训练分布不同,但其选择往往随意,且可能无法代表真实的未知异常数据。我们发现当前文献中不同选择的辅助数据集会导致检测器性能显著波动。本文正式提出并解决了一个常被忽视的问题:在没有给定OOD数据的情况下如何调优检测器。为此,我们提出了强基线方法,并进一步设计了一种无需额外数据、仅利用模型训练数据的通用调优策略。实验表明,该方法在高参数检测器家族中持续优于基线,在低参数家族中表现相当。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Existing out-of-distribution (OOD) detectors are often tuned by a separate dataset deemed OOD with respect to the training distribution of a neural network (NN). OOD detectors process the activations of NN layers and score the output, where parameters of the detectors are determined by fitting to an in-distribution (training) set and the aforementioned dataset chosen adhocly. At detector training time, this adhoc dataset may not be available or difficult to obtain, and even when it's available, it may not be representative of actual OOD data, which is often ''unknown unknowns." Current benchmarks may specify some left-out set from test OOD sets. We show that there can be significant variance in performance of detectors based on the adhoc dataset chosen in current literature, and thus even if such a dataset can be collected, the performance of the detector may be highly dependent on the choice. In this paper, we introduce and formalize the often neglected problem of tuning OOD detectors without a given ``OOD'' dataset. To this end, we present strong baselines as an attempt to approach this problem. Furthermore, we propose a new generic approach to OOD detector tuning that does not require any extra data other than those used to train the NN. We show that our approach improves over baseline methods consistently across higher-parameter OOD detector families, while being comparable across lower-parameter families.

分布外检测无监督调优零样本学习模型可靠性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。