区分机器人交互中用户赋予人性与设计者添加人性的两种不同现象
Disambiguating Anthropomorphism and Anthropomimesis in Human-Robot Interaction
- 将用户感知机器人具有人性定义为'拟人化'，将开发者主动设计人性特征定义为'拟人模拟'
- 明确两者责任主体不同：感知者对拟人化负责，设计者对拟人模拟负责
- 为未来人机交互研究提供清晰理论基础，适合研究伦理与设计原则的学者
本文初步厘清了人机交互（HRI）与社交机器人领域中两个理论概念——拟人化与拟人模拟的区别。拟人化指用户将人类特质投射到机器人身上；拟人模拟则是机器人开发者主动在设计中加入人类特征。本研究旨在为未来人机交互学术研究提供概念澄清与探讨框架，尤其关注人类特质的责任归属问题：拟人化由机器人感知者承担，拟人模拟由机器人设计者承担。通过建立清晰的理论分界，本文希望为后续机器人设计与评估研究奠定基础。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In this preliminary work, we offer an initial disambiguation of the theoretical concepts anthropomorphism and anthropomimesis in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) and social robotics. We define anthropomorphism as users perceiving human-like qualities in robots, and anthropomimesis as robot developers designing human-like features into robots. This contribution aims to provide a clarification and exploration of these concepts for future HRI scholarship, particularly regarding the party responsible for human-like qualities - robot perceiver for anthropomorphism, and robot designer for anthropomimesis. We provide this contribution so that researchers can build on these disambiguated theoretical concepts for future robot design and evaluation.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。