arXiv:2602.11668cs.LG2026-02

用运动捕捉+机器学习识别跑者膝伤,准确率超70%

Explainable Machine-Learning based Detection of Knee Injuries in Runners

  • 融合时序数据与离散指标,提升损伤模式识别能力
  • 卷积神经网络表现最优,对髌股疼痛准确率达77.9%
  • 结合可解释性工具,帮助医生理解模型决策依据

跑步虽普及但膝伤高发,尤以髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)和髂胫束综合症(ITBS)为主。本研究利用光学运动捕捉系统分析839名健康与受伤跑者的跑步数据,聚焦支撑相,提取关节与节段角度的时序信号及离散点值。针对健康/受伤、健康/PFPS、健康/ITBS三类分类任务,比较传统算法(KNN、高斯过程、决策树)与深度学习模型(CNN、LSTM)的表现。结果表明,结合时序与离散特征显著提升检测效果;深度模型优于传统方法,其中CNN在PFPS分类中达到77.9%准确率,ITBS为73.8%,综合损伤类为71.43%。研究还应用Shapley值、显著图与Grad-CAM等可解释性工具,揭示模型关键判别因素。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Running is a widely practiced activity but shows a high incidence of knee injuries, especially Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS) and Iliotibial Band Syndrome (ITBS). Identifying gait patterns linked to these injuries can improve clinical decision-making, which requires precise systems capable of capturing and analyzing temporal kinematic data. This study uses optical motion capture systems to enhance detection of injury-related running patterns. We analyze a public dataset of 839 treadmill recordings from healthy and injured runners to evaluate how effectively these systems capture dynamic parameters relevant to injury classification. The focus is on the stance phase, using joint and segment angle time series and discrete point values. Three classification tasks are addressed: healthy vs. injured, healthy vs. PFPS, and healthy vs. ITBS. We examine different feature spaces, from traditional point-based metrics to full stance-phase time series and hybrid representations. Multiple models are tested, including classical algorithms (K-Nearest Neighbors, Gaussian Processes, Decision Trees) and deep learning architectures (CNNs, LSTMs). Performance is evaluated with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Explainability tools such as Shapley values, saliency maps, and Grad-CAM are used to interpret model behavior. Results show that combining time series with point values substantially improves detection. Deep learning models outperform classical ones, with CNNs achieving the highest accuracy: 77.9% for PFPS, 73.8% for ITBS, and 71.43% for the combined injury class. These findings highlight the potential of motion capture systems coupled with advanced machine learning to identify knee injury-related running patterns.

膝伤检测运动分析可解释AI深度学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。