arXiv:2602.15950cs.CVcs.LG2026-02被引 1

视觉语言模型靠文字识别推理空间关系,纯图像则严重失准。

Can Vision-Language Models See Squares? Text-Recognition Mediates Spatial Reasoning Across Three Model Families

  • 用带字和无字的方格图测试模型,发现文字能显著提升准确率
  • 无文字时三模型准确率跌至60%-73%,F1降至29%-39%
  • 不同模型各有失效模式,但都暴露出对非文本图像的空间定位缺陷

我们设计了一个简单实验,揭示视觉语言模型(VLMs)的根本局限:当二值网格中的填充单元缺乏文本标识时,无法准确定位。生成了十五个15×15的网格,填充密度在10.7%至41.8%之间,以两种图像形式呈现——文本符号(. 和 #)与无网格线的实心方块。让三种前沿VLM(Claude Opus、ChatGPT 5.2、Gemini 3 Thinking)进行转录。在文本符号条件下,Claude与ChatGPT的单元准确率约91%,F1达84%;Gemini准确率为84%,F1为63%。而在实心方块条件下,三者准确率均下降至60%-73%,F1降至29%-39%。关键的是,所有条件均通过相同的视觉编码器——文本符号为图像而非分词文本。文本与方块条件间的F1差距达34至54分,表明VLMs依赖高保真文字识别路径进行空间推理,其性能远超原生视觉路径。各模型在方块条件中表现出不同失效模式:系统性少计(Claude)、严重多计(ChatGPT)、模板幻觉(Gemini),但共有的核心缺陷是:对非文本视觉元素的空间定位能力严重退化。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We present a simple experiment that exposes a fundamental limitation in vision-language models (VLMs): the inability to accurately localize filled cells in binary grids when those cells lack textual identity. We generate fifteen 15x15 grids with varying density (10.7%-41.8% filled cells) and render each as two image types -- text symbols (. and #) and filled squares without gridlines -- then ask three frontier VLMs (Claude Opus, ChatGPT 5.2, and Gemini 3 Thinking) to transcribe them. In the text-symbol condition, Claude and ChatGPT achieve approximately 91% cell accuracy and 84% F1, while Gemini achieves 84% accuracy and 63% F1. In the filled-squares condition, all three models collapse to 60-73% accuracy and 29-39% F1. Critically, all conditions pass through the same visual encoder -- the text symbols are images, not tokenized text. The text-vs-squares F1 gap ranges from 34 to 54 points across models, demonstrating that VLMs behave as if they possess a high-fidelity text-recognition pathway for spatial reasoning that dramatically outperforms their native visual pathway. Each model exhibits a distinct failure mode in the squares condition -- systematic under-counting (Claude), massive over-counting (ChatGPT), and template hallucination (Gemini) -- but all share the same underlying deficit: severely degraded spatial localization for non-textual visual elements.

视觉语言模型空间推理文字识别图像理解

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。