arXiv:2602.16264cs.LGastro-ph.SR2026-02

用可解释奖励框架提升太阳耀斑预测准确率。

Prediction of Major Solar Flares Using Interpretable Class-dependent Reward Framework with Active Region Magnetograms and Domain Knowledge

  • 引入类相关奖励机制,融合磁图与领域知识特征。
  • 结合矢量和视向磁场数据,使Transformer模型性能最优。
  • 模型可解释性强,适合科研与空间天气预警应用。

本文首次构建了基于类依赖奖励(CDR)的监督分类框架,用于24小时内预测≥MM级太阳耀斑。我们构建了包含领域知识特征与视向(LOS)磁图的多个数据集,并应用CNN、CNN-BiLSTM和Transformer三种深度学习模型及其对应的CDR版本。首先,通过Transformer分析LOS磁场参数重要性,比较仅用LOS、仅用矢量、以及联合使用三种配置的性能;其次,对比CDR模型与普通深度学习模型的预测效果;第三,对CDR模型中的奖励设计进行敏感性分析;第四,采用SHAP方法实现模型可解释性分析;最后,将模型性能与NASA/CCMC系统进行对比。主要发现:(1) 在LOS特征组合中,R_VALUE和AREA_ACR始终表现最佳;(2) 使用联合LOS与矢量磁场数据时,Transformer性能优于单独使用任一类型;(3) 融入领域知识特征的模型优于仅使用磁图的模型;(4) 虽然在磁图数据上CNN与CNN-BiLSTM优于其CDR版本,但使用知识特征时,CDR-Transformer略胜于其对应模型;(5) CDR模型性能对奖励设置不敏感;(6) SHAP分析显示,CDR模型更重视TOTUSJH,而Transformer更关注R_VALUE;(7) 在相同预测时间与活跃区数量下,CDR-Transformer显著优于NASA/CCMC系统。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

In this work, we develop, for the first time, a supervised classification framework with class-dependent rewards (CDR) to predict $\geq$MM flares within 24 hr. We construct multiple datasets, covering knowledge-informed features and line-of sight (LOS) magnetograms. We also apply three deep learning models (CNN, CNN-BiLSTM, and Transformer) and three CDR counterparts (CDR-CNN, CDR-CNN-BiLSTM, and CDR-Transformer). First, we analyze the importance of LOS magnetic field parameters with the Transformer, then compare its performance using LOS-only, vector-only, and combined magnetic field parameters. Second, we compare flare prediction performance based on CDR models versus deep learning counterparts. Third, we perform sensitivity analysis on reward engineering for CDR models. Fourth, we use the SHAP method for model interpretability. Finally, we conduct performance comparison between our models and NASA/CCMC. The main findings are: (1)Among LOS feature combinations, R_VALUE and AREA_ACR consistently yield the best results. (2)Transformer achieves better performance with combined LOS and vector magnetic field data than with either alone. (3)Models using knowledge-informed features outperform those using magnetograms. (4)While CNN and CNN-BiLSTM outperform their CDR counterparts on magnetograms, CDR-Transformer is slightly superior to its deep learning counterpart when using knowledge-informed features. Among all models, CDR-Transformer achieves the best performance. (5)The predictive performance of the CDR models is not overly sensitive to the reward choices.(6)Through SHAP analysis, the CDR model tends to regard TOTUSJH as more important, while the Transformer tends to prioritize R_VALUE more.(7)Under identical prediction time and active region (AR) number, the CDR-Transformer shows superior predictive capabilities compared to NASA/CCMC.

太阳耀斑可解释模型强化学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。