arXiv:2602.17308cs.AIcs.LG2026-02被引 1

让AI像医生一样问诊,通过追问逐步缩小诊断范围。

MedClarify: An information-seeking AI agent for medical diagnosis with case-specific follow-up questions

  • 基于信息熵设计追问策略,主动选择最能减少不确定性的提问。
  • 在不完整病历下,诊断错误率比单次问答模型降低27个百分点。
  • 适合医疗AI系统、临床辅助诊断工具的研发与应用。

大语言模型(LLMs)在医学诊断中的应用日益广泛。然而,临床诊断通常需通过多轮问诊,逐步排除可能的疾病并确认最终诊断。当前医学LLM在生成有效追问方面能力有限。本文提出MedClarify,一个旨在支持诊断决策的信息寻求型AI代理。它首先生成候选诊断列表(类似鉴别诊断),再主动提出能最大化信息增益的追问问题,实现有针对性的不确定性驱动推理。实验表明,现有LLM在病历不完整时常给出多个相似可能性的诊断;而采用信息论方法的MedClarify可将诊断错误率降低约27个百分点(p.p.),显著优于标准单次问答基线。MedClarify为提升医学LLM的智能交互能力提供了新路径,推动更贴近真实临床思维的对话式诊断系统发展。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for diagnostic tasks in medicine. In clinical practice, the correct diagnosis can rarely be immediately inferred from the initial patient presentation alone. Rather, reaching a diagnosis often involves systematic history taking, during which clinicians reason over multiple potential conditions through iterative questioning to resolve uncertainty. This process requires considering differential diagnoses and actively excluding emergencies that demand immediate intervention. Yet, the ability of medical LLMs to generate informative follow-up questions and thus reason over differential diagnoses remains underexplored. Here, we introduce MedClarify, an AI agent for information-seeking that can generate follow-up questions for iterative reasoning to support diagnostic decision-making. Specifically, MedClarify computes a list of candidate diagnoses analogous to a differential diagnosis, and then proactively generates follow-up questions aimed at reducing diagnostic uncertainty. By selecting the question with the highest expected information gain, MedClarify enables targeted, uncertainty-aware reasoning to improve diagnostic performance. In our experiments, we first demonstrate the limitations of current LLMs in medical reasoning, which often yield multiple, similarly likely diagnoses, especially when patient cases are incomplete or relevant information for diagnosis is missing. We then show that our information-theoretic reasoning approach can generate effective follow-up questioning and thereby reduces diagnostic errors by ~27 percentage points (p.p.) compared to a standard single-shot LLM baseline. Altogether, MedClarify offers a path to improve medical LLMs through agentic information-seeking and to thus promote effective dialogues with medical LLMs that reflect the iterative and uncertain nature of real-world clinical reasoning.

医疗AI问诊机器人信息获取诊断辅助

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。