AI正重塑科学教育,但需以伦理框架保障公平与人性核心。
The Landscape of AI in Science Education: What is Changing and How to Respond
- 构建负责任的AI教育伦理框架,引导技术与教育价值对齐。
- 智能辅导、自适应学习等工具提升个性化教学与评估效率。
- 强调教师与学生的人类特质不可替代,如共情、创造力与道德判断。
本文探讨人工智能(AI)在科学教育领域带来的变革,指出其正重塑教育目标、流程、教学材料、评估方式及期望成果。智能辅导系统、自适应学习平台、自动化反馈与生成式内容创作等工具,提升了个性化、效率与教育公平性,同时培养面向智能社会的关键能力,如批判性思维、创造力与跨学科协作。然而,也带来公平性、透明度、问责制、隐私与人类监督等伦理与教育挑战。为此,文章提出应建立负责任与伦理原则(REP)框架,指导AI整合符合公平、科学诚信与民主参与的价值观。基于此,本文综述了五项核心变革及应对策略。强调AI不应取代教师与学习者,而是作为支持探究、丰富评估与拓展真实科学实践的伙伴。最后指出,道德判断、关系联结、创造性想象与对话共建意义等人类特质仍不可或缺,唯有保持这些核心,才能推动科学教育的公平、诚信与人文发展。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This introductory chapter explores the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in reshaping the landscape of science education. Positioned at the intersection of tradition and innovation, AI is altering educational goals, procedures, learning materials, assessment practices, and desired outcomes. We highlight how AI-supported tools, such as intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning platforms, automated feedback, and generative content creation--enhance personalization, efficiency, and equity while fostering competencies essential for an AI-driven society, including critical thinking, creativity, and interdisciplinary collaboration. At the same time, this chapter examines the ethical, social, and pedagogical challenges that arise, particularly issues of fairness, transparency, accountability, privacy, and human oversight. To address these tensions, we argue that a Responsible and Ethical Principles (REP) framework is needed to offer guidance for aligning AI integration with values of fairness, scientific integrity, and democratic participation. Through this lens, we synthesize the changes brought to each of the five transformative aspects and the approaches introduced to meet the changes according to the REP framework. We argue that AI should be viewed not as a replacement for human teachers and learners but as a partner that supports inquiry, enriches assessment, and expands access to authentic scientific practices. Aside from what is changing, we conclude by exploring the roles that remain uniquely human, engaging as moral and relational anchors in classrooms, bringing interpretive and ethical judgement, fostering creativity, imagination, and curiosity, and co-constructing meaning through dialogue and community, and assert that these qualities must remain central if AI is to advance equity, integrity, and human flourishing in science education.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。