自动选择地图密度,让视觉定位在局部区域稳定达标。
Automatic Map Density Selection for Locally-Performant Visual Place Recognition
- 用两次环境巡检数据,自动计算满足要求的地图密度
- 在两个数据集上实现目标局部召回率,覆盖指定比例环境
- 比传统全局召回率更准确反映实际部署性能
将视觉位置识别(VPR)从实验室推向长期部署的关键挑战在于:需确保系统在环境各部分均满足用户指定的性能要求,而非仅整体平均达标。控制局部性能的关键因素是参考地图数据库的密度,但现有方法普遍采用固定采样密度,由传感器、存储或GPS频率等工程因素决定。本文提出一种VPR建图方法,利用环境中两次参考遍历数据,自动选择满足两个用户定义要求的合适地图密度:(1) 目标局部召回率@1(Local Recall@1),(2) 该性能需达到或超过的环境比例,称为召回达成率(RAR)。方法通过多密度下参考图对匹配的空间一致性与连贯性特征,估计在未见部署数据上达成目标所需的密度。在两种VPR方法及Nordland和Oxford RobotCar基准上的实验表明,本系统在至少用户指定比例的环境中持续达到或超过目标局部召回率@1。与多种基线对比显示,其能可靠选择合适地图密度,避免过度密集。消融实验评估了参考遍历选择和段长敏感性,分析表明传统全局召回率@1是预测更具操作意义的RAR指标的差劲指标。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
A key challenge in translating Visual Place Recognition (VPR) from the lab to long-term deployment is ensuring a priori that a system can meet user-specified performance requirements across different parts of an environment, rather than just on average globally. One critical mechanism for controlling this local performance is the density of the reference mapping database, yet this factor is largely neglected in existing work, where fixed, engineering-driven sampling densities based on sensors, storage, or GPS frequency are typically used. In this paper, we propose a VPR mapping approach that uses two reference traverses from the operating environment to automatically select an appropriate map density satisfying two user-defined requirements: (1) a target Local Recall@1 level, and (2) the proportion of the operational environment over which it must be met or exceeded, which we term the Recall Achievement Rate (RAR). Our approach uses spatial consistency and coherence features from reference-to-reference matches at multiple map densities to estimate the density needed to meet these targets on unseen deployment data. Through experiments across two VPR methods and the Nordland and Oxford RobotCar benchmarks, we show that our system consistently meets or exceeds the target Local Recall@1 over at least the user-specified proportion of the environment. Comparisons with alternative baselines show that it reliably selects an appropriate operating point in map density, avoiding unnecessarily dense maps. Finally, ablations evaluate sensitivity to reference traversal choice and segment length, and our analysis reveals that conventional global Recall@1 is a poor predictor of the often more operationally meaningful RAR metric.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。