揭示梯度下降优化器如何影响模型特征学习能力
Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror Flow
- 提出镜流框架统一分析梯度下降类算法的优化几何
- 发现陡峭下降能更好逃离鞍点并促进特征学习
- 解释AdamW为何在微调中优于SGD,适合研究优化机制者
为探究优化算法如何影响模型特征学习能力,本文提出梯度镜流作为统一理论框架,用于分析包括符号下降(与Adam密切相关)在内的最速下降方法。该框架揭示了优化几何如何决定学习动态、隐式偏差和稀疏性,并提供两个解释:为何Adam和AdamW常在微调中优于SGD。基于对角线线性网络及深层对角线重参数化(注意力机制的简化代理),研究发现陡峭下降有助于鞍点逃逸与特征学习;而标准梯度下降需极大学习率才能逃逸鞍点,这在微调中极为罕见。实证表明,鞍点逃逸是微调中的核心挑战。此外,我们证明解耦权重衰减(如AdamW)通过引入新型平衡方程稳定特征学习。这些结果揭示了最速下降提升现代优化的两种机制。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
How does the choice of optimization algorithm shape a model's ability to learn features? To address this question for steepest descent methods --including sign descent, which is closely related to Adam --we introduce steepest mirror flows as a unifying theoretical framework. This framework reveals how optimization geometry governs learning dynamics, implicit bias, and sparsity and it provides two explanations for why Adam and AdamW often outperform SGD in fine-tuning. Focusing on diagonal linear networks and deep diagonal linear reparameterizations (a simplified proxy for attention), we show that steeper descent facilitates both saddle-point escape and feature learning. In contrast, gradient descent requires unrealistically large learning rates to escape saddles, an uncommon regime in fine-tuning. Empirically, we confirm that saddle-point escape is a central challenge in fine-tuning. Furthermore, we demonstrate that decoupled weight decay, as in AdamW, stabilizes feature learning by enforcing novel balance equations. Together, these results highlight two mechanisms how steepest descent can aid modern optimization.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。