arXiv:2603.02155cs.LGcs.AI2026-03被引 3

首次给出KL正则化老虎机问题的近最优后悔上界,揭示正则强度影响规律。

Near-Optimal Regret for KL-Regularized Multi-Armed Bandits

  • 用新颖的分层论证分析KL-UCB算法,获得线性依赖臂数K的上界。
  • 首次证明Ω(ηK log T)下界,验证上界几乎紧致。
  • 覆盖所有正则强度范围,适合关注在线学习理论的研究者。

近期研究显示,带有KL正则化的强化学习可实现更快收敛速度或对数后悔,优于经典无正则设置下的√T型后悔。然而,针对多臂老虎机(MAB)的KL正则化在线学习的统计效率仍不明确。本文通过新颖的分层论证,对KL-UCB进行精确分析,得到一个˜O(ηK log²T)的高概率后悔上界:首个关于K呈线性依赖的上界。其中,T为时间范围,K为臂的数量,η⁻¹为正则强度。该分析的近紧性由首个非恒定下界Ω(ηK log T)证实,源于精细的困难实例构造与贝叶斯先验的定制分解。此外,在低正则化区间(即大η值),我们证明了后悔量与η无关,其规模为˜Θ(√KT)。整体结果在η、K、T三个参数上提供了近乎最优的界限,全面刻画了各正则强度下的行为。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Recent studies have shown that reinforcement learning with KL-regularized objectives can enjoy faster rates of convergence or logarithmic regret, in contrast to the classical $\sqrt{T}$-type regret in the unregularized setting. However, the statistical efficiency of online learning with respect to KL-regularized objectives remains far from completely characterized, even when specialized to multi-armed bandits (MABs). We address this problem for MABs via a sharp analysis of KL-UCB using a novel peeling argument, which yields a $\tilde{O}(ηK\log^2T)$ upper bound: the first high-probability regret bound with linear dependence on $K$. Here, $T$ is the time horizon, $K$ is the number of arms, $η^{-1}$ is the regularization intensity, and $\tilde{O}$ hides all logarithmic factors except those involving $\log T$. The near-tightness of our analysis is certified by the first non-constant lower bound $Ω(ηK \log T)$, which follows from subtle hard-instance constructions and a tailored decomposition of the Bayes prior. Moreover, in the low-regularization regime (i.e., large $η$), we show that the KL-regularized regret for MABs is $η$-independent and scales as $\tildeΘ(\sqrt{KT})$. Overall, our results provide a thorough understanding of KL-regularized MABs across all regimes of $η$ and yield nearly optimal bounds in terms of $K$, $η$, and $T$.

强化学习老虎机正则化后悔界

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。