arXiv:2603.02217cs.LGcs.AI2026-03被引 2

不重训练也能压缩MoE模型,只需轻量级路由校准即可恢复性能。

Is Retraining-Free Enough? The Necessity of Router Calibration for Efficient MoE Compression

  • 只更新路由模块参数,不改专家参数,实现免重训练压缩。
  • 在细粒度MoE上性能提升显著,因路由边界更复杂。
  • 适合部署时需快速压缩模型且无法重训练的场景。

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) 模型能高效扩展容量,但其庞大的参数量导致部署时内存瓶颈。我们把免重训练的MoE压缩分为三类:专家剪枝、专家编辑和专家合并,并发现压缩后性能下降主要源于一个被忽视的因素:专家变化而路由未更新导致的路由-专家不匹配。我们认为有效的免重训练压缩应保持专家参数不变,仅允许轻量级路由校准。为此,我们提出路由器知识蒸馏(Router KD),通过在无标签校准数据上蒸馏原始模型的下一个词分布,仅更新极小比例的参数(即路由模块)。在所有三类代表性方法上的实验均显示性能一致恢复,尤其在细粒度MoE(多个小型专家)中提升更大,因其路由决策边界更复杂。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models scale capacity efficiently, but their massive parameter footprint creates a deployment-time memory bottleneck. We organize retraining-free MoE compression into three paradigms - Expert Pruning, Expert Editing, and Expert Merging - and show that persistent post-compression degradation largely stems from a neglected factor: router-expert mismatch when experts are changed but the router is left untouched. We argue that effective retraining-free compression should avoid updating expert parameters while allowing lightweight router calibration. To this end, we propose Router Knowledge Distillation (Router KD), which updates only a tiny fraction of parameters (the router) by distilling the original model's next-token distribution on unlabeled calibration data. Experiments across representative methods in all three paradigms demonstrate consistent performance recovery, with substantially larger gains in fine-grained MoEs (many small experts) than in coarse-grained MoEs due to their more complex routing decision boundaries.

MoE模型压缩路由校准知识蒸馏

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。