378位专业视觉艺术家调研揭示：多数拒绝使用生成式AI，因工作压力与机会减少。
How Professional Visual Artists are Negotiating Generative AI in the Workplace
- 通过问卷调查378名艺术家，分析其对生成式AI的拒绝策略与职场应对。
- 超八成艺术家认为生成式AI带来负面职场影响，加剧压力并减少就业机会。
- 研究呼吁人机交互领域尊重艺术家不使用AI的意愿，深入理解其职业诉求。
生成式AI受到媒体与人机交互研究领域的广泛批评，但其对专业视觉艺术家工作场所与职业生涯的影响仍需深入探讨。本文通过对378名经验证的专业视觉艺术家进行调查，探究生成式AI对其职业与工作环境的影响。研究发现：（1）多数艺术家强烈反对使用文本或视觉类生成式AI，通过多种拒绝策略抵制其在工作中的引入；（2）艺术家所处环境中的多重压力——来自客户、上司及同行——显著影响其使用决策；（3）艺术家普遍报告生成式AI对其工作环境造成负面影响，导致额外压力和职业机会减少。基于这些发现，我们呼吁人机交互研究者更深入地回应艺术家不愿在工作中使用生成式AI的意愿。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Generative AI has been heavily critiqued by artists in both popular media and HCI scholarship. However, more work is needed to understand the impacts of generative AI on professional artists' workplaces and careers. In this paper, we conduct a survey of 378 verified professional visual artists about how generative AI has impacted their careers and workplaces. We find (1) most visual artists are strongly opposed to using generative AI (text or visual) and negotiate their inclusion in the workplace through a variety of refusal strategies (2) there exist a range of factors in artists environments shaping their use of generative AI, including pressure from clients, bosses, and peers and (3) visual artists report overwhelmingly negative impacts of generative AI on their workplaces, leading to added stress and reduced job opportunities. In light of these findings, we encourage HCI researchers to contend more deeply with artists' desires not to use generative AI in the workplace.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。