测试AI模仿当代艺术的能力,发现生成作品缺乏深度与情感。
The Art That Poses Back: Assessing AI Pastiches after Contemporary Artworks
- 邀请12位艺术家参与,评估AI生成的仿作
- 颜色纹理相似但构图概念差距大,整体感知差异显著
- 适合关注AI艺术创作边界与评价标准的研究者
本研究探讨人工智能在视觉创作中的表现,聚焦ChatGPT生成图像模仿原版绘画、素描、雕塑和装置艺术的能力。十二位来自罗马尼亚、保加利亚、法国、奥地利和英国的艺术家各提供三件作品,并对AI生成的仿作进行评分与评论。分析结合人工评价与计算方法,检测原作与生成版本在视觉风格与构图上的异同。结果显示,颜色与纹理层面相似度高,但构图、概念及感知层面存在显著差距。因此建议采用多维度‘风格迁移仪表盘’评估相似性,而非单一指标。艺术家普遍认为,这些仿作缺乏维度感、语境与意图,更像机械复述或近似引用,而非能引发情感共鸣的原创艺术。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This study explores artificial visual creativity, focusing on ChatGPT's ability to generate new images intentionally pastiching original artworks such as paintings, drawings, sculptures and installations. The process involved twelve artists from Romania, Bulgaria, France, Austria, and the United Kingdom, each invited to contribute with three of their artworks and to grade and comment on the AI-generated versions. The analysis combines human evaluation with computational methods aimed at detecting visual and stylistic similarities or divergences between the original works and their AI-produced renditions. The results point to a significant gap between color and texture-based similarity and compositional, conceptual, and perceptual one. Consequently, we advocate for the use of a "style transfer dashboard" of complementary metrics to evaluate the similarity between pastiches and originals, rather than using a single style metric. The artists' comments revealed limitations of ChatGPT's pastiches after contemporary artworks, which were perceived by the authors of the originals as lacking dimensionality, context, and intentional sense, and seeming more of a paraphrase or an approximate quotation rather than as a valuable, emotion-evoking artwork.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。