构建可落地的伦理框架,让AI从开发到运行全程可控。
Building the ethical AI framework of the future: from philosophy to practice
- 在每个阶段设三道关卡:性能、合规、环保,自动检测风险。
- 明确触发条件和升级路径,支持与现有CI/CD流程集成。
- 适合关注AI伦理落地、合规与可持续性的团队使用。
人工智能流程(涵盖数据收集、模型训练、部署及部署后监控)集中了伦理风险,且随着多模态与自主系统的发展而加剧。现有治理工具如欧盟AI法案、IEEE 7000系列和NIST AI风险管理框架虽提供高层指导,但普遍缺乏可执行、端到端的操作控制。本文提出一种伦理嵌入式控制架构,将后果主义、义务论与美德伦理融入生命周期各阶段的执行机制中。框架在每个阶段实施三重门控结构:度量门(量化性能与安全阈值)、治理门(法律、权利与程序合规)、生态门(碳与水预算及可持续性约束)。明确可测量的触发条件、升级路径、审计记录,并映射至欧盟AI法案义务与NIST RMF功能,支持与现有MLOps和CI/CD流程整合。大型语言模型流水线的示例表明,基于门控的控制可在发布前与运行时识别并抑制技术、社会与环境风险。框架配套预注册评估协议,定义事前成功标准与评估流程,实现门控有效性的可验证评估。通过将规范承诺转化为可执行、可测试的控制,该框架为跨组织、跨司法管辖区、多规模部署的AI治理提供实用基础。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Artificial intelligence pipelines -- spanning data collection, model training, deployment, and post-deployment monitoring -- concentrate ethical risks that intensify with multimodal and agentic systems. Existing governance instruments, including the EU AI Act, the IEEE 7000 series, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, provide high-level guidance but often lack enforceable, end-to-end operational controls. This paper presents an ethics-by-design control architecture that embeds consequentialist, deontological, and virtue-ethical reasoning into stage-specific enforcement mechanisms across the AI lifecycle. The framework implements a triple-gate structure at each lifecycle stage: Metric gates (quantitative performance and safety thresholds), Governance gates (legal, rights, and procedural compliance), and Eco gates (carbon and water budgets and sustainability constraints). It specifies measurable trigger conditions, escalation paths, audit artefacts, and mappings to EU AI Act obligations and NIST RMF functions, enabling integration with existing MLOps and CI/CD pipelines. Illustrative examples from large language model pipelines demonstrate how gate-based controls can surface and constrain technical, social, and environmental risks prior to release and during runtime. The framework is accompanied by a preregistered evaluation protocol that defines ex ante success criteria and assessment procedures, enabling falsifiable evaluation of gate effectiveness. By translating normative commitments into enforceable and testable controls, the framework provides a practical basis for operational AI governance across organizational contexts, jurisdictions, and deployment scales.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。