AI写作助手让作者变成被动响应者，易受模型偏见影响。
Reactive Writers: How Co-Writing with AI Changes How We Engage with Ideas
- 写作时先看AI建议再决定是否采纳，取代了原有构思过程。
- 1291次协作中，作者多在未完成自创想法前就采纳建议。
- 作者感觉掌控全局，却未察觉思想已被AI引导。
新兴实验证据表明，使用AI辅助写作会改变人们表达的观点以及后续持有的态度。然而，我们对协同写作中行为与流程变化的理解仍不充分，这些变化正是AI写作工具具备观点塑造能力的基础。本研究结合对19名参与者的回顾性访谈与对1291次AI协同写作会话的定量分析，发现：阅读并判断是否采纳AI建议成为写作的核心活动，挤占了原有的构思与语言生成环节。由于作者常在未完成自主构思前即接触建议，所提观点和意见便引导了后续的扩展方向。同时，作者并未意识到AI的影响，仍感觉自己完全掌控最终文本，因为理论上可随时修改。我们称此现象为“反应式写作”：一种以评估为先、依赖建议的写作模式，在有AI协助时明显偏离传统写作方式，且极易受到AI引发的偏见与观点迁移影响。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Emerging experimental evidence shows that writing with AI assistance can change both the views people express in writing and the opinions they hold afterwards. Yet, we lack substantive understanding of procedural and behavioral changes in co-writing with AI that underlie the observed opinion-shaping power of AI writing tools. We conducted a mixed-methods study, combining retrospective interviews with 19 participants about their AI co-writing experience with a quantitative analysis tracing engagement with ideas and opinions in 1{,}291 AI co-writing sessions. Our analysis shows that engaging with the AI's suggestions -- reading them and deciding whether to accept them -- becomes a central activity in the writing process, taking away from more traditional processes of ideation and language generation. As writers often do not complete their own ideation before engaging with suggestions, the suggested ideas and opinions seeded directions that writers then elaborated on. At the same time, writers did not notice the AI's influence and felt in full control of their writing, as they -- in principle -- could always edit the final text. We term this shift \textit{Reactive Writing}: an evaluation-first, suggestion-led writing practice that departs substantially from conventional composing in the presence of AI assistance and is highly vulnerable to AI-induced biases and opinion shifts.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。