用中英文混合数据检测金融诈骗,传统模型表现优于Transformer。
Multilingual Financial Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning and Transformer Models: A Bangla-English Study
- 结合TF-IDF与经典机器学习模型,处理中英混杂的金融诈骗文本。
- Linear SVM准确率91.59%,比Transformer高2个百分点。
- 适合关注低资源语言诈骗检测的研究者与风控工程师。
金融欺诈检测在数字金融平台快速扩张背景下成为关键研究挑战。尽管机器学习方法在识别欺诈行为方面表现优异,但现有研究多集中于英语数据,限制了在多语言场景中的应用。孟加拉语(约2.5亿人使用)在此领域仍鲜有研究。本文基于包含合法与欺诈性金融消息的数据集,在中英文混合环境下评估经典机器学习模型(逻辑回归、线性SVM、集成分类器)与基于Transformer的架构。采用5折分层交叉验证,结果显示线性SVM表现最佳,准确率达91.59%,F1得分为91.30%,较Transformer模型(准确率89.49%,F1 88.88%)高出约2个百分点。Transformer虽具备更高欺诈召回率(94.19%),但误报率偏高。探索性分析显示:诈骗信息更长,含紧迫性词汇,32%含网址,97%含电话号码;而合法消息则包含交易确认和具体币种信息。研究表明,精心设计特征的经典模型在多语言欺诈检测中仍具竞争力,同时揭示语言多样性、代码混用与低资源语言带来的挑战。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Financial fraud detection has emerged as a critical research challenge amid the rapid expansion of digital financial platforms. Although machine learning approaches have demonstrated strong performance in identifying fraudulent activities, most existing research focuses exclusively on English-language data, limiting applicability to multilingual contexts. Bangla (Bengali), despite being spoken by over 250 million people, remains largely unexplored in this domain. In this work, we investigate financial fraud detection in a multilingual Bangla-English setting using a dataset comprising legitimate and fraudulent financial messages. We evaluate classical machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Ensemble classifiers) using TF-IDF features alongside transformer-based architectures. Experimental results using 5-fold stratified cross-validation demonstrate that Linear SVM achieves the best performance with 91.59 percent accuracy and 91.30 percent F1 score, outperforming the transformer model (89.49 percent accuracy, 88.88 percent F1) by approximately 2 percentage points. The transformer exhibits higher fraud recall (94.19 percent) but suffers from elevated false positive rates. Exploratory analysis reveals distinctive patterns: scam messages are longer, contain urgency-inducing terms, and frequently include URLs (32 percent) and phone numbers (97 percent), while legitimate messages feature transactional confirmations and specific currency references. Our findings highlight that classical machine learning with well-crafted features remains competitive for multilingual fraud detection, while also underscoring the challenges posed by linguistic diversity, code-mixing, and low-resource language constraints.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。