arXiv:2603.11721cs.AI2026-03被引 2

为医院设计可安全运行的智能代理系统,自动处理临床流程

When OpenClaw Meets Hospital: Toward an Agentic Operating System for Dynamic Clinical Workflows

  • 构建四组件架构,实现医疗场景下的安全代理执行与长期病历管理
  • 在MIMIC-IV数据集上,层级导航召回率提升21%,精度达基线2.2倍
  • 适合医疗信息化、AI辅助诊疗系统研发者参考

大型语言模型代理通过推理、工具调用和持续记忆扩展生成模型能力,可用于自动化复杂医疗任务。然而其在医院环境中部署受限于安全风险、透明度不足及长期临床上下文处理能力欠缺。本文提出一种适配医院环境的代理架构,包含:受控执行环境(类多用户操作系统)、以文档为中心的医患代理交互模型、基于页面索引的记忆架构用于纵向病历管理,以及可组合的医学技能库。该系统基于开源代理编排框架OpenClaw实现,构成面向医院的智能操作系统基础,支持临床工作流协调,同时保障安全性、透明性与可审计性。为评估记忆组件,引入基于说明书的层次化检索机制。在基于MIMIC-IV v2.2数据集的基准测试中,包含100例去标识患者记录和300个分三难度层级的临床查询(每层100个),该方法整体召回率与元数据过滤的RAG基线相当(0.877 vs 0.876),但精度高出2.2倍(0.779 vs 0.352),且检索文档更少;在三级纵向查询中,说明书召回率高21%(0.846 vs 0.701),证实模型引导的层次导航在跨多个治疗阶段查询时价值最大。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language model (LLM) agents extend generative models with reasoning, tool use, and persistent memory, thereby enabling the automation of complex tasks. In healthcare, such systems could support documentation, care coordination, and clinical decision making. Their reliable deployment in hospitals, however, remains constrained by safety risks, limited transparency, and inadequate mechanisms for handling longitudinal clinical context. Here we propose an architecture that adapts LLM agents to hospital environments. The design comprises four components: a restricted execution environment inspired by multi-user operating systems, a document-centric interaction model linking patient and clinician agents, a page-indexed memory architecture for longitudinal context management, and a curated library of composable medical skills. Implemented on top of OpenClaw, an open-source agent orchestration framework, this design provides the basis for an Agentic Operating System for Hospitals: a computing layer for coordinating clinical workflows while preserving safety, transparency, and auditability. To evaluate the memory component, we introduce manifest-guided retrieval for hierarchical navigation of longitudinal patient records. In a benchmark derived from the MIMIC-IV dataset (v2.2) comprising 100 de-identified patient records and 300 clinical queries stratified across three difficulty tiers (100 per tier), manifest-guided retrieval matched a metadata-filtered RAG baseline on overall recall (0.877 versus 0.876) while achieving 2.2x higher precision (0.779 versus 0.352) and retrieving fewer documents; on tier-3 longitudinal queries, manifest recall was 21% higher (0.846 versus 0.701), confirming that LLM-guided hierarchical navigation is most valuable when queries span multiple care episodes. These results outline a practical path toward hospital-scale agentic infrastructure.

医疗AI智能代理病历管理

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。