梳理生成式AI在信息系统中的研究现状与未来方向
The Landscape of Generative AI in Information Systems: A Synthesis of Secondary Reviews and Research Agendas
- 基于28篇综述文献,系统分析生成式AI在信息系统中的应用与挑战
- 发现技术快速演进与社会制度滞后之间存在显著不匹配
- 提出聚焦人机协同、动态验证与适应性治理的研究新方向
ChatGPT之后,生成式AI迅速重塑信息系统(IS)研究与实践。随着组织和社会面临生成式AI的采纳问题,一系列二次研究和研究议程类文献涌现,旨在整合早期证据并指引未来研究。本文通过在Scopus、WoS和eAIS中检索2023年至今的文献,经过多阶段严格筛选,最终纳入28篇论文进行文献计量与主题分析,并对所有来源进行质量评估以确保结论可靠性。研究发现,生成式AI具有提升生产力、加速创新、个性化服务及民主化知识获取的变革潜力;但其采纳受制于技术不可靠性、社会伦理风险与治理空白等多重因素。从社会技术视角看,技术子系统快速演化与社会子系统缓慢适应之间存在持续错配,凸显信息系统研究在实现双系统协同优化中的关键作用。为此,本文提出一项研究议程,推动信息系统学术界从单纯分析影响转向主动塑造技术能力与组织流程、社会价值及监管制度的共同演化,强调混合人机协同、情境化验证、概率系统设计原则与自适应治理。对从业者与政策制定者而言,负责任的采纳需平衡自动化与人类增强,辅以透明治理与灵活法规,以实现广泛共享的效益。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The post-ChatGPT surge has rapidly reframed IS research and practice. As organizations and society grapple with GenAI adoption, a body of secondary studies and research agendas has emerged to synthesize early evidence and chart directions for future inquiry. This study reviews secondary and roadmap papers to synthesize the state of knowledge on GenAI's benefits and challenges in IS, and to identify future research directions. We performed a systematic search across Scopus, WoS, and eAIS for publications from 2023 onwards. Following a rigorous, multi-stage screening process, we selected a final set of 28 papers for analysis using bibliometric mapping and thematic analysis. We also conducted a quality assessment of all sources to gauge confidence in each source's contribution to the findings. GenAI offers transformative potential to drive productivity, accelerate innovation, personalize services, and democratize access to expertise. However, its adoption is constrained by interrelated challenges: technical unreliability, societal-ethical risks, and a governance vacuum. Interpreted through a socio-technical lens, our findings reveal a persistent misalignment between GenAI's fast-evolving technical subsystem and the slower-adapting social subsystem, positioning IS research as critical for achieving joint optimization. To bridge this gap, we propose a research agenda that reorients IS scholarship from analyzing impacts toward actively shaping the co-evolution of technical capabilities with organizational routines, societal values, and regulatory institutions: emphasizing hybrid human-AI ensembles, situated validation, design principles for probabilistic systems, and adaptive governance. For practitioners and policymakers, responsible adoption requires balancing automation with human augmentation alongside transparent governance and adaptive regulations to ensure broadly shared benefits.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。