首个面向钣金折弯可制造性的合成数据集,支持全流程评估
BenDFM: A taxonomy and synthetic CAD dataset for manufacturability assessment in sheet metal bending
- 构建可制造性分类体系,明确度量维度与依赖关系
- 生成2万件含可制造/不可制造样本的仿真零件数据集
- 验证图结构模型在表面关联建模上的优势,揭示特定工艺标签预测难点
早期预测CAD设计的可制造性(包括可行性与制造难度)是制造设计(DFM)的核心目标。尽管深度学习在CAD领域取得进展并广泛用于制造工艺选择,但针对特定工艺的可制造性学习方法仍有限。两大挑战制约发展:现有研究对可制造性的定义不统一,导致学习目标差异大;可用数据集稀缺。现有标签涵盖从固有设计约束到特定工艺能力依赖的多种类型,且范围从离散可行判断到连续复杂度度量。工业数据集通常仅包含可制造零件,缺乏不可制造样本的信号;现有合成数据集多聚焦简单几何与减材工艺。为此,本文提出一个基于配置依赖性与度量类型双重维度的可制造性分类体系,明确泛化能力与学习目标边界。随后,我们推出首个面向钣金折弯可制造性评估的合成数据集BenDFM,包含20,000个零件,通过过程感知折弯仿真生成,涵盖折叠与展开几何形态及分类体系下的多重可制造性标签,支持此前未被探索的学习型DFM问题系统研究。我们在BenDFM上对两种先进3D学习架构进行基准测试,结果表明:捕捉部件表面间关系的图结构表示更具准确性;而依赖特定制造配置的度量预测仍具挑战性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Predicting the manufacturability of CAD designs early, in terms of both feasibility and required effort, is a key goal of Design for Manufacturing (DFM). Despite advances in deep learning for CAD and its widespread use in manufacturing process selection, learning-based approaches for predicting manufacturability within a specific process remain limited. Two key challenges limit progress: inconsistency across prior work in how manufacturability is defined and consequently in the associated learning targets, and a scarcity of suitable datasets. Existing labels vary significantly: they may reflect intrinsic design constraints or depend on specific manufacturing capabilities (such as available tools), and they range from discrete feasibility checks to continuous complexity measures. Furthermore, industrial datasets typically contain only manufacturable parts, offering little signal for infeasible cases, while existing synthetic datasets focus on simple geometries and subtractive processes. To address these gaps, we propose a taxonomy of manufacturability metrics along the axes of configuration dependence and measurement type, allowing clearer scoping of generalizability and learning objectives. Next, we introduce BenDFM, the first synthetic dataset for manufacturability assessment in sheet metal bending. BenDFM contains 20,000 parts, both manufacturable and unmanufacturable, generated with process-aware bending simulations, providing both folded and unfolded geometries and multiple manufacturability labels across the taxonomy, enabling systematic study of previously unexplored learning-based DFM challenges. We benchmark two state-of-the-art 3D learning architectures on BenDFM, showing that graph-based representations that capture relationships between part surfaces achieve better accuracy, and that predicting metrics that depend on specific manufacturing setups remains more challenging.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。