仅用皮肤电活动就能区分有氧运动与静息状态
Electrodermal Activity as a Unimodal Signal for Aerobic Exercise Detection in Wearable Sensors
- 只用皮肤电活动特征,通过机器学习分类
- 跨被试验证下准确率达中等水平(平均约70%)
- 适合资源有限的可穿戴设备做基础状态判断
皮肤电活动(EDA)是一种可无创获取的生理信号,广泛存在于可穿戴设备中,反映交感神经系统的激活。以往多模态研究显示,将EDA与心率、加速度等信号结合能有效区分压力与运动状态。然而,仅依靠EDA在跨被试条件下区分持续有氧运动与低唤醒状态的能力尚未充分评估。本研究基于30名健康个体的公开数据集,使用留一被试交叉验证(LOSO)评估仅基于EDA特征的分类性能。结果显示,仅用EDA的分类器在不同模型下均达到中等跨被试表现,其中瞬时动态特征和事件发生时间对类别分离贡献显著。本工作并非主张以单模态取代多模态,而是为纯EDA输入提供保守基准,明确其在可穿戴设备中作为单一信号进行活动状态推断的潜力。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Electrodermal Activity (EDA) is a non-invasive physiological signal widely available in wearable devices and reflects sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation. Prior multi-modal studies have demonstrated robust performance in distinguishing stress and exercise states when EDA is combined with complementary signals such as heart rate and accelerometry. However, the ability of EDA to independently distinguish sustained aerobic exercise from low-arousal states under subject-independent evaluation remains insufficiently characterized. This study investigates whether features derived exclusively from EDA can reliably differentiate rest from sustained aerobic exercise. Using a publicly available dataset collected from thirty healthy individuals, EDA features were evaluated using benchmark machine learning models with leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation. Across models, EDA-only classifiers achieved moderate subject-independent performance, with phasic temporal dynamics and event timing contributing to class separation. Rather than proposing EDA as a replacement for multimodal sensing, this work provides a conservative benchmark of the discriminative power of EDA alone and clarifies its role as a unimodal input for wearable activity-state inference.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。