用领域特定的AI提问激发深度思考，提升判断力。
Promoting Critical Thinking With Domain-Specific Generative AI Provocations
- 设计可互动的生成式AI提问，依赖用户参与产生认知摩擦
- 实测显示，领域定制化提问显著促进批判性思维表现
- 适合教育、内容创作等需深度分析的场景
关于生成式AI（GenAI）对批判性思维影响的研究结果不一，取决于其使用方式。一些研究认为，AI引发的挑战性问题（如要求人类澄清与论证）有助于激发批判性思维。基于我们为知识工作设计并评估的两个GenAI工具——面向艺术诠释的ArtBot和面向AI隐私的Privy——的经验，我们反思了设计选择如何塑造这类提问的形式与效果。观察与用户反馈表明，通过依赖用户贡献、引入有效摩擦的领域特定提问，能切实支持批判性思维。本文展示使用者对两款原型的体验，并指出支持批判性思维可能需要超越静态提问，转向能适应用户偏好与专业水平的动态方法。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The evidence on the effects of generative AI (GenAI) on critical thinking is mixed, with studies suggesting both potential harms and benefits depending on its implementation. Some argue that AI-driven provocations, such as questions asking for human clarification and justification, are beneficial for eliciting critical thinking. Drawing on our experience designing and evaluating two GenAI-powered tools for knowledge work, ArtBot in the domain of fine art interpretation and Privy in the domain of AI privacy, we reflect on how design decisions shape the form and effectiveness of such provocations. Our observations and user feedback suggest that domain-specific provocations, implemented through productive friction and interactions that depend on user contribution, can meaningfully support critical thinking. We present participant experiences with both prototypes and discuss how supporting critical thinking may require moving beyond static provocations toward approaches that adapt to user preferences and levels of expertise.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。