用可解释的机器学习改进牙科记录比对,提升身份识别准确率
On the use of Aggregation Operators to improve Human Identification using Dental Records
- 设计可解释的聚合方法融合七类牙科特征进行比对
- 白盒机器学习使平均排名从3.91提升至2.02~2.21
- 结果可被法医专家验证,适合司法场景应用
牙科记录比对是法医牙科学中用于多人场景下快速识别个体的标准技术。其中,牙图比对通过计算多项标准进行排序。当前自动方法或采用简单技术未能充分挖掘信息,或因缺乏同行评审而不可解释。本文提出基于七项标准的新型聚合机制,包括基于数据驱动的字典序聚合、经典模糊逻辑方法及机器学习聚合。在两个不同人群共215个法医案例上验证,使用可解释机器学习模型的平均排名达2.02至2.21,显著优于现有方法(平均排名3.91),同时保持方法透明性与可验证性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The comparison of dental records is a standardized technique in forensic dentistry used to speed up the identification of individuals in multiple-comparison scenarios. Specifically, the odontogram comparison is a procedure to compute criteria that will be used to perform a ranking. State-of-the-art automatic methods either make use of simple techniques, without utilizing the full potential of the information obtained from a comparison, or their internal behavior is not known due to the lack of peer-reviewed publications. This work aims to design aggregation mechanisms to automatically compare pairs of dental records that can be understood and validated by experts, improving the current methods. To do so, we introduce different aggregation approaches using the state-of-the-art codification, based on seven different criteria. In particular, we study the performance of i) data-driven lexicographical order-based aggregations, ii) well-known fuzzy logic aggregation methods and iii) machine learning techniques as aggregation mechanisms. To validate our proposals, 215 forensic cases from two different populations have been used. The results obtained show how the use of white-box machine learning techniques as aggregation models (average ranking from 2.02 to 2.21) are able to improve the state-of-the-art (average ranking of 3.91) without compromising the explainability and interpretability of the method.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。