系统梳理地理时空数据库的自然语言查询方法与挑战
Natural Language Interfaces for Spatial and Temporal Databases: A Comprehensive Overview of Methods, Taxonomy, and Future Directions
- 构建地理时空数据的自然语言接口,支持非专业用户操作
- 发现现有方法在数据集和评估标准上差异显著
- 适合数据库与NLP交叉研究者参考
自然语言数据库接口(NLIDB)近年来受到数据库与自然语言处理领域的广泛关注。随着位置感知传感器的快速发展,地理空间数据集大量涌现,地理空间数据库在支撑地理应用中扮演关键角色。然而,地理时空数据库的查询与传统关系型数据库存在本质差异,主要体现在地理拓扑算子和时间算子的使用上。为弥合地理查询语言与非专家用户之间的鸿沟,地理空间研究社区日益关注面向地理空间数据库的NLIDB开发。但现有研究分散于不同系统、数据集和方法选择中,难以清晰把握现有方法的优劣与未来方向。现有综述多聚焦通用数据库系统,未将地理时空数据库作为核心分析对象。为此,本文全面综述了地理时空数据库的NLIDB研究,系统梳理了数据集、评估指标与方法分类体系,并进行对比分析。研究揭示了现有方法的共性趋势、数据集与评估实践的显著差异,以及持续阻碍该领域进展的若干开放挑战。基于此,本文提出了若干有前景的未来研究方向。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The task of building a natural language interface to a database, known as NLIDB, has recently gained significant attention from both the database and Natural Language Processing (NLP) communities. With the proliferation of geospatial datasets driven by the rapid emergence of location-aware sensors, geospatial databases play a vital role in supporting geospatial applications. However, querying geospatial and temporal databases differs substantially from querying traditional relational databases due to the presence of geospatial topological operators and temporal operators. To bridge the gap between geospatial query languages and non-expert users, the geospatial research community has increasingly focused on developing NLIDBs for geospatial databases. Yet, existing research remains fragmented across systems, datasets, and methodological choices, making it difficult to clearly understand the landscape of existing methods, their strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities for future research. Existing surveys on NLIDBs focus on general-purpose database systems and do not treat geospatial and temporal databases as primary focus for analysis. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive survey of studies on NLIDBs for geospatial and temporal databases. Specifically, we provide a detailed overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and the taxonomy of the methods for geospatial and temporal NLIDBs, as well as a comparative analysis of the existing methods. Our survey reveals recurring trends in existing methods, substantial variation in datasets and evaluation practices, and several open challenges that continue to hinder progress in this area. Based on these findings, we identify promising directions for future research to advance natural language interfaces to geospatial and temporal databases.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。