arXiv:2603.25495cs.LGcs.AI2026-03

轻量可解释模型在北京PM2.5预测中表现优异,兼顾精度与效率。

Interpretable PM2.5 Forecasting for Urban Air Quality: A Comparative Study of Operational Time-Series Models

  • 采用时间序列分块与外生变量建模,构建抗泄漏预测流程
  • 修正后SARIMAX误差最低(MAE 32.50,RMSE 46.85)
  • Facebook Prophet经残差修正后效率提升近97%,适合实时部署

准确的短期空气质量预测对公共健康与城市管理至关重要,但许多现有框架依赖复杂、数据密集且计算成本高的模型。本研究检验了轻量级可解释方法在北京市小时级PM2.5预测中的竞争力。基于多年污染物与气象时间序列数据,构建了包含时序分块、预处理、特征选择与外生驱动建模的抗泄漏预测流程,在完全预报设定下评估了SARIMAX、Facebook Prophet与NeuralProphet三类模型。通过每周滚动重训练与冻结模型+在线残差校正两种模式测试其实际部署性能。结果表明:滚动重训练下Facebook Prophet表现最优(MAE 37.61,RMSE 50.10),执行时间显著低于NeuralProphet;冻结模型模式中,残差校正使SARIMAX误差最低(MAE 32.50,RMSE 46.85),Facebook Prophet修正后误差接近滚动版本,运行时间从15分21.91秒降至46.60秒。NeuralProphet在两模式下均不准确且不稳定。结果表明,轻量级加性模型在城市空气质量预测中仍具竞争力,兼顾精度与可解释性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Accurate short-term air-quality forecasting is essential for public health protection and urban management, yet many recent forecasting frameworks rely on complex, data-intensive, and computationally demanding models. This study investigates whether lightweight and interpretable forecasting approaches can provide competitive performance for hourly PM2.5 prediction in Beijing, China. Using multi-year pollutant and meteorological time-series data, we developed a leakage-aware forecasting workflow that combined chronological data partitioning, preprocessing, feature selection, and exogenous-driver modeling under the Perfect Prognosis setting. Three forecasting families were evaluated: SARIMAX, Facebook Prophet, and NeuralProphet. To assess practical deployment behavior, the models were tested under two adaptive regimes: weekly walk-forward refitting and frozen forecasting with online residual correction. Results showed clear differences in both predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Under walk-forward refitting, Facebook Prophet achieved the strongest completed performance, with an MAE of $37.61$ and an RMSE of $50.10$, while also requiring substantially less execution time than NeuralProphet. In the frozen-model regime, online residual correction improved Facebook Prophet and SARIMAX, with corrected SARIMAX yielding the lowest overall error (MAE $32.50$; RMSE $46.85$). NeuralProphet remained less accurate and less stable across both regimes, and residual correction did not improve its forecasts. Notably, corrected Facebook Prophet reached nearly the same error as its walk-forward counterpart while reducing runtime from $15$ min $21.91$ sec to $46.60$ sec. These findings show that lightweight additive forecasting strategies can remain highly competitive for urban air-quality prediction, offering a practical balance between accuracy, interpretability, ...

PM2.5预测时间序列可解释性轻量化模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。