揭示贝叶斯网络与因果模型的转换关系及影响
On the Relationship between Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Structural Causal Models
- 用线性代数和规划方法实现两类模型互转
- 证明了转换存在性与唯一性的维度条件
- 帮助理解因果推理中语义变化,适合因果研究者
本文研究概率图模型(特别是贝叶斯网络)与因果图(即结构因果模型)之间的关系。结构因果模型是基于结构方程的确定性模型,通过添加独立且未观测的随机变量并赋予概率分布来引入不确定性。核心问题是:由专家知识或数据学习得到的贝叶斯网络能否转化为概率结构因果模型?这种转化对网络结构和概率分布有何影响?本文表明,线性代数和线性规划是实现转换的关键工具,并基于概率因果模型的维度分析了解的存在性与唯一性。最后探讨了该转换对模型语义的影响。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In this paper, the relationship between probabilistic graphical models, in particular Bayesian networks, and causal diagrams, also called structural causal models, is studied. Structural causal models are deterministic models, based on structural equations or functions, that can be provided with uncertainty by adding independent, unobserved random variables to the models, equipped with probability distributions. One question that arises is whether a Bayesian network that has obtained from expert knowledge or learnt from data can be mapped to a probabilistic structural causal model, and whether or not this has consequences for the network structure and probability distribution. We show that linear algebra and linear programming offer key methods for the transformation, and examine properties for the existence and uniqueness of solutions based on dimensions of the probabilistic structural model. Finally, we examine in what way the semantics of the models is affected by this transformation. Keywords: Causality, probabilistic structural causal models, Bayesian networks, linear algebra, experimental software.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。